Literature DB >> 9168682

A breast cancer care report card. An assessment of performance and a pursuit of value.

J G West1, M L Sutherland, J S Link, D A Margileth.   

Abstract

The transition to managed care raises concerns about the resulting quality of care. The report card, a publicly released, standardized report on quality, has received widespread acceptance as a method to evaluate physician performance. Current report cards provide insufficient information to allow purchasers of health care to assess accurately the performance of professionals who provide breast care. To overcome these limitations, we propose an expanded report card on breast cancer care. Mammographers and general surgeons would assess an independent series of at least 100 consecutive cases of newly diagnosed breast cancer. Mammographers would determine the percentage of invasive cancers < 15 mm detected on screening mammograms in asymptomatic women aged 50 to 74 years. Surgeons would determine the percentage of combined stages 0 and 1 breast cancers detected and the percentage of patients receiving breast-conserving surgical therapy. Performance targets are set at 60% for invasive cancers < 15 mm detected on screening mammography, 60% for combined stage 0 and 1 breast cancers, and 50% for patients receiving breast-conserving therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9168682      PMCID: PMC1304204     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  43 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of breast cancer.

Authors:  J J Zavertnik; C B McCoy; D S Robinson; N Love
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Early detection of breast carcinoma: a comparison of palpable and nonpalpable lesions.

Authors:  P Perdue; D Page; M Nellestein; C Salem; C Galbo; B Ghosh
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening: preliminary results of a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  M L Brown; L Fintor
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  The palpable breast nodule. A cost-effectiveness analysis of alternate diagnostic approaches.

Authors:  L J Layfield; E A Chrischilles; M B Cohen; K Bottles
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  A B Nattinger; M S Gottlieb; J Veum; D Yahnke; J S Goodwin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Effects of mastectomy versus lumpectomy on emotional adjustment to breast cancer: a prospective study of the first year postsurgery.

Authors:  C Pozo; C S Carver; V Noriega; S D Harris; D S Robinson; A S Ketcham; A Legaspi; F L Moffat; K C Clark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer.

Authors:  J Z Ayanian; B A Kohler; T Abe; A M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Breast cancer among black and white women in the 1980s. Changing patterns in the United States by race, age, and extent of disease.

Authors:  G M Swanson; N E Ragheb; C S Lin; B F Hankey; B Miller; P Horn-Ross; E White; J M Liff; L C Harlan; W P McWhorter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer in premenopausal women.

Authors:  T J Smith; B E Hillner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Recent incidence trends for breast cancer in women and the relevance of early detection: an update.

Authors:  B A Miller; E J Feuer; B F Hankey
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.