Literature DB >> 8289662

The effects of generation on item and order retention in immediate and delayed recall.

D J Burns1, E T Curti, J C Lavin.   

Abstract

Recent research has shown that generating words from fragments, relative to simply reading them, inhibits processing of order information. Nairne, Riegler, and Serra (1991) showed that this reduction in processing of order information leads to deficits in recall performance. In three experiments, we generally replicate Nairne et al.'s results and demonstrate that the deficit in recall for the generated items is dependent on the easy distractor task and the relatively short (30-sec) retention interval they used. When a difficult distractor task was used, generating produced a deficit in amount of order information processed, but actually facilitated recall when recall was delayed 80 sec. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that generating words inhibits order processing, but they do not support the contention that the reduction in order processing is responsible for the deficit in recall that is sometimes observed for the generated items. The importance of the item-order distinction in explaining the generation effect, as well as the role of the item-order distinction in the long-term-memory arena, is questioned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8289662     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  5 in total

1.  Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention.

Authors:  J S Nairne; G L Riegler; M Serra
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The generation effect: a test between single- and multifactor theories.

Authors:  D J Burns
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The negative generation effect: delineation of a phenomenon.

Authors:  S R Schmidt; K Cherry
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-05

4.  Design controversies and the generation effect: support for an item-order hypothesis.

Authors:  M Serra; J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-01

5.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03
  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  The generation effect: dissociating enhanced item memory and disrupted order memory.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-09

2.  The item-order hypothesis reconsidered: the role of order information in free recall.

Authors:  Johannes Engelkamp; Petra Jahn; Kerstin H Seiler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-25

3.  The origin of the interaction between learning method and delay in the testing effect: the roles of processing and conceptual retrieval organization.

Authors:  Adam Congleton; Suparna Rajaram
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

4.  The generation effect: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Sharon Bertsch; Bryan J Pesta; Richard Wiscott; Michael A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

5.  Effects of word frequency on individual-item and serial order retention: tests of the order-encoding view.

Authors:  Paul S Merritt; Edward L DeLosh; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12

6.  The bizarre imagery effect and intention to learn.

Authors:  D J Burns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-06

7.  Instability in memory phenomena: a common puzzle and a unifying explanation.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

8.  The role of item distinctiveness in short-term recall of order information.

Authors:  T F Cunningham; W R Marmie; A F Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.