Literature DB >> 24213877

The bizarre imagery effect and intention to learn.

D J Burns1.   

Abstract

The bizarre imagery effect, better memory for bizarre stimuli than for common stimuli, is now an established finding. However, the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery are subject to several constraints (e.g., the use of mixed lists and free-recall tests). A further constraint on the bizarreness effect is demonstrated here. In each of two experiments, subjects were given either incidental or intentional study instructions and were asked to rate the vividness of the images they formed from the bizarre and common sentences. Contrary to conclusions based on available evidence, the bizarreness effect in free recall was manifested only with the incidental learning instructions. This additional constraint on the effect is consistent with the item-order account of bizarreness.

Year:  1996        PMID: 24213877     DOI: 10.3758/BF03212428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  7 in total

1.  Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention.

Authors:  J S Nairne; G L Riegler; M Serra
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The generation effect: a test between single- and multifactor theories.

Authors:  D J Burns
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The item-order distinction and the generation effect: the importance of order information in long-term memory.

Authors:  D J Burns
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1996

4.  The bizarreness effect: it's not surprising, it's complex.

Authors:  M A McDaniel; G O Einstein; E L DeLosh; C P May; P Brady
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Design controversies and the generation effect: support for an item-order hypothesis.

Authors:  M Serra; J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-01

6.  The effects of generation on item and order retention in immediate and delayed recall.

Authors:  D J Burns; E T Curti; J C Lavin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-11

7.  Further constraints on the bizarreness effect: elaboration at encoding.

Authors:  B Robinson-Riegler; M A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-11
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Nothing concentrates the mind: thoughts of death improve recall.

Authors:  Joshua Hart; Daniel J Burns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.