Literature DB >> 9566175

Do vouchers improve breast cancer screening rates? Results from a randomized trial.

T J Stoner1, B Dowd, W P Carr, G Maldonado, T R Church, J Mandel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a voucher for free mammography on compliance with recommended mammography screening guidelines. STUDY
DESIGN: Vouchers for free mammography distributed to a random sample of women over the age of 50 in two rural southern Minnesota counties. The vouchers were good for one year. Baseline and follow-up data were collected and rates of compliance with current mammography guidelines were observed for the voucher group and a control group of women living in the same counties.
METHODS: Logistic regression models were used to estimate the effect of the voucher on compliance with mammography guidelines and the impact of factors potentially influencing the effectiveness of the voucher. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The voucher improved mammography rates primarily through increasing screening among women who were out of compliance at baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: Vouchers, even when distributed randomly within a population of rural Midwestern women, can significantly improve compliance rates. Vouchers are no less effective a means of increasing screening among vulnerable women than among other women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9566175      PMCID: PMC1070244     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  32 in total

1.  Do state rate setting regulations really lower hospital expenses?

Authors:  D Dranove; K Cone
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Urban and rural differences in health insurance and access to care.

Authors:  D Hartley; L Quam; N Lurie
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Mammogram utilization among farm women.

Authors:  W P Carr; G Maldonado; P R Leonard; J U Halberg; T R Church; J H Mandel; B Dowd; J S Mandel
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Breast self-examination practices and attitudes of women with and without a history of breast cancer.

Authors:  L M Strauss; L J Solomon; M C Costanza; J K Worden; R S Foster
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1987-08

5.  The changing rural environment and the relationship between health services and rural development.

Authors:  S M Cordes
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Recruitment activities and sociodemographic factors that predict attendance at a mammographic screening program.

Authors:  S F Hurley; R M Huggins; D J Jolley; D Reading
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Promoting screening mammography in inner-city settings: a randomized controlled trial of computerized reminders as a component of a program to facilitate mammography.

Authors:  R C Burack; P A Gimotty; J George; W Stengle; L Warbasse; A Moncrease
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Medicare coverage, supplemental insurance, and the use of mammography by older women.

Authors:  J Blustein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Is cost a barrier to screening mammography for low-income women receiving Medicare benefits? A randomized trial.

Authors:  C I Kiefe; S V McKay; A Halevy; B A Brody
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-06-13
View more
  11 in total

1.  Cue-dose training with monetary reinforcement: pilot study of an antiretroviral adherence intervention.

Authors:  M O Rigsby; M I Rosen; J E Beauvais; J A Cramer; P M Rainey; S S O'Malley; K D Dieckhaus; B J Rounsaville
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Health insurance and mammography: would a Medicare buy-in take us to universal screening?

Authors:  Donald H Taylor; Lynn Van Scoyoc; Sarah Tropman Hawley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Lessons from state mandates of preventive cancer screenings.

Authors:  Wendy Yi Xu; Bryan Dowd; Jean Abraham
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-03-15

4.  Perceptions of insurance coverage for screening mammography among women in need of screening.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Katherine W Reeves; Cathy Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Cost as a barrier to screening mammography among underserved women.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Katherine W Reeves; Cathy Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Can vouchers make a difference to the use of private primary care services by older people? Experience from the healthcare reform programme in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Carrie H K Yam; Su Liu; Olivia H Y Huang; E K Yeoh; Sian M Griffiths
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.

Authors:  Valerie C Brueton; Jayne Tierney; Sally Stenning; Seeromanie Harding; Sarah Meredith; Irwin Nazareth; Greta Rait
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-03

8.  Long-term effectiveness of elderly health care voucher scheme strategies: a system dynamics simulation analysis.

Authors:  Ka Chun Chong; Hong Fung; Carrie Ho Kwan Yam; Patsy Yuen Kwan Chau; Tsz Yu Chow; Benny Chung Ying Zee; Eliza Lai Yi Wong; Maggie Haitian Wang; Eng Kiong Yeoh
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.

Authors:  Katie Gillies; Anna Kearney; Ciara Keenan; Shaun Treweek; Jemma Hudson; Valerie C Brueton; Thomas Conway; Andrew Hunter; Louise Murphy; Peter J Carr; Greta Rait; Paul Manson; Magaly Aceves-Martins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-06

10.  Home visits to improve breast health knowledge and screening practices in a less privileged area in Jordan.

Authors:  Hana Taha; Lennarth Nyström; Raeda Al-Qutob; Vanja Berggren; Hamideh Esmaily; Rolf Wahlström
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.