Literature DB >> 24327338

Segmenting patients and physicians using preferences from discrete choice experiments.

Ken Deal1.   

Abstract

People often form groups or segments that have similar interests and needs and seek similar benefits from health providers. Health organizations need to understand whether the same health treatments, prevention programs, services, and products should be applied to everyone in the relevant population or whether different treatments need to be provided to each of several segments that are relatively homogeneous internally but heterogeneous among segments. Our objective was to explain the purposes, benefits, and methods of segmentation for health organizations, and to illustrate the process of segmenting health populations based on preference coefficients from a discrete choice conjoint experiment (DCE) using an example study of prevention of cyberbullying among university students. We followed a two-level procedure for investigating segmentation incorporating several methods for forming segments in Level 1 using DCE preference coefficients and testing their quality, reproducibility, and usability by health decision makers. Covariates (demographic, behavioral, lifestyle, and health state variables) were included in Level 2 to further evaluate quality and to support the scoring of large databases and developing typing tools for assigning those in the relevant population, but not in the sample, to the segments. Several segmentation solution candidates were found during the Level 1 analysis, and the relationship of the preference coefficients to the segments was investigated using predictive methods. Those segmentations were tested for their quality and reproducibility and three were found to be very close in quality. While one seemed better than others in the Level 1 analysis, another was very similar in quality and proved ultimately better in predicting segment membership using covariates in Level 2. The two segments in the final solution were profiled for attributes that would support the development and acceptance of cyberbullying prevention programs among university students. Those segments were very different-where one wanted substantial penalties against cyberbullies and were willing to devote time to a prevention program, while the other felt no need to be involved in prevention and wanted only minor penalties. Segmentation recognizes key differences in why patients and physicians prefer different health programs and treatments. A viable segmentation solution may lead to adapting prevention programs and treatments for each targeted segment and/or to educating and communicating to better inform those in each segment of the program/treatment benefits. Segment members' revealed preferences showing behavioral changes provide the ultimate basis for evaluating the segmentation benefits to the health organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24327338     DOI: 10.1007/s40271-013-0037-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  17 in total

1.  Survey-design and analytical strategies for better healthcare stated-choice studies.

Authors:  F Reed Johnson; Carol Mansfield
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  LOGISMOS--layered optimal graph image segmentation of multiple objects and surfaces: cartilage segmentation in the knee joint.

Authors:  Yin Yin; Xiangmin Zhang; Rachel Williams; Xiaodong Wu; Donald D Anderson; Milan Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; A Brett Hauber; Deborah Marshall; Andrew Lloyd; Lisa A Prosser; Dean A Regier; F Reed Johnson; Josephine Mauskopf
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Modeling the problem-based learning preferences of McMaster University undergraduate medical students using a discrete choice conjoint experiment.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Alan Neville; Heather Rimas; Lynne Lohfeld
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.853

Review 5.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine.

Authors:  M H Zweig; G Campbell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 6.  Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine.

Authors:  J Bensing
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2000-01

7.  Predicting carcinoid heart disease with the noisy-threshold classifier.

Authors:  Marcel A J van Gerven; Rasa Jurgelenaite; Babs G Taal; Tom Heskes; Peter J F Lucas
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 8.  Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: 'much ado about nothing'?

Authors:  L Arseneault; L Bowes; S Shakoor
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  The importance of patient preferences in the measurement of health care satisfaction.

Authors:  C K Ross; C A Steward; J M Sinacore
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Method: automatic segmentation of mitochondria utilizing patch classification, contour pair classification, and automatically seeded level sets.

Authors:  Richard J Giuly; Maryann E Martone; Mark H Ellisman
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review of Patients' and Parents' Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care.

Authors:  Nicole K Schatz; Gregory A Fabiano; Charles E Cunningham; Susan dosReis; Daniel A Waschbusch; Stephanie Jerome; Kellina Lupas; Karen L Morris
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Using Best-Worst Scaling to Understand Patient Priorities: A Case Example of Papanicolaou Tests for Homeless Women.

Authors:  Eve Wittenberg; Monica Bharel; John F P Bridges; Zachary Ward; Linda Weinreb
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Using Latent Class Analysis to Model Preference Heterogeneity in Health: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mo Zhou; Winter Maxwell Thayer; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Key Issues and Potential Solutions for Understanding Healthcare Preference Heterogeneity Free from Patient-Level Scale Confounds.

Authors:  Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Terry N Flynn; Hong Il Yoo; Jay Magidson; Mark Oppe
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Engaging patients and caregivers in prioritizing symptoms impacting quality of life for Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Ilene L Hollin; Holly Peay; Ryan Fischer; Ellen M Janssen; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Preference phenotypes to facilitate shared decision-making in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; W Benjamin Nowell; George Michel; Carole Wiedmeyer
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Colorectal Cancer Screening: Preferences, Past Behavior, and Future Intentions.

Authors:  Carol Mansfield; Donatus U Ekwueme; Florence K L Tangka; Derek S Brown; Judith Lee Smith; Gery P Guy; Chunyu Li; Brett Hauber
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Variation in Treatment Priorities for Chronic Hepatitis C: A Latent Class Analysis.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; Joseph Lim; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Valerie Reyna; Alexander Monto; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  How Much Money Should be Paid for a Patient to Isolate During the COVID-19 Outbreak? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Iran.

Authors:  Enayatollah Homaie Rad; Mohammad Hajizadeh; Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi; Sajad Delavari; Zahra Mohtasham-Amiri
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 2.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.