Literature DB >> 7583649

Patient satisfaction and normative decision theory.

P F Brennan1.   

Abstract

This article explores the application of normative decision theory (NDT) to the challenge of facilitating and measuring patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction is the appraisal, by an individual, of the extent to which the care provided has met that individual's expectations and preferences. Classic decision analysis provides a graphic and computational strategy to link patient preferences for outcomes to the treatment choices likely to produce the outcomes. Multiple criteria models enable the complex judgment task of measuring patient satisfaction to be decomposed into elemental factors that reflect patient preferences, thus facilitating evaluation of care in terms of factors relevant to the individual patient. Through the application of NDT models, it is possible to use patient preferences as a guide to the treatment planning and care monitoring process and to construct measures of patient satisfaction that are meaningful to the individual. Nursing informatics, with its foundations in both information management and decision sciences, provides the tools and data necessary to promote care provided in accord with patient preferences and to ensure appraisal of satisfaction that aptly captures the complex, multidimensional nature of patient preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7583649      PMCID: PMC116263          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1995.96010394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  9 in total

1.  Phase II: influencing decision making in SUPPORT.

Authors:  N V Dawson; S J Youngner; A F Connors
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decisions.

Authors:  J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Do patients' evaluations of a future health state change when they actually enter that state?

Authors:  H A Llewellyn-Thomas; H J Sutherland; E C Thiel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  An evaluation of multiple trauma severity indices created by different index development strategies.

Authors:  D H Gustafson; D G Fryback; J H Rose; C T Prokop; D E Detmer; J C Rossmeissl; C M Taylor; F Alemi; A J Carnazzo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Developing shared decision-making programs to improve the quality of health care.

Authors:  J F Kasper; A G Mulley; J E Wennberg
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1992-06

7.  Nursing decision making in critical care areas.

Authors:  A Baumann; F Bourbonnais
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.187

8.  Evaluation of a gerontological nursing continuing education programme: effect on nurses' knowledge and attitudes and on patients' perceptions and satisfaction.

Authors:  L L Harrison; D Novak
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  The importance of patient preferences in the measurement of health care satisfaction.

Authors:  C K Ross; C A Steward; J M Sinacore
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.983

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  The satisfaction of Latina breast cancer survivors with their healthcare and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Kimberly A Wildes; Alexander R Miller; Sandra San Miguel de Majors; Pamela M Otto; Amelie G Ramirez
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Hospital Quality Reporting in the United States: Does Report Card Design and Incorporation of Patient Narrative Comments Affect Hospital Choice?

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Informatics: the infrastructure for quality assessment and quality improvement.

Authors:  S J Grobe
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  What can patients do to improve health care?

Authors:  Michel Wensing; Richard Grol
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Patient satisfaction in an acute medicine department in Morocco.

Authors:  Ghizlane Soufi; Jihane Belayachi; Salma Himmich; Samir Ahid; Mehdi Soufi; Aicha Zekraoui; Redouane Abouqal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Nina Meszmer; Uwe Sander
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Services; An Application of Physician's Behavior as a Moderator.

Authors:  Faiza Manzoor; Longbao Wei; Abid Hussain; Muhammad Asif; Syed Irshad Ali Shah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.