Literature DB >> 8236849

Light adaptation of human rod receptors: the leading edge of the human a-wave and models of rod receptor activity.

D C Hood1, D G Birch.   

Abstract

The human rod receptors can be studied by measuring the leading edge of the rod a-wave of the ERG. Computational models, previously shown to fit the recordings from single rods, are fitted to dark-adapted a-wave responses. A model proposed by Lamb and Pugh [(1992) Journal of Physiology, 499, 719-758] fits slightly better than the traditional models based upon n-stage exponential filters. To test alternative models of rod light adaptation, a-waves were recorded to flashes presented upon steady adapting lights. Steady adapting lights decrease the rods' sensitivity. Human rods must adapt as response compression alone predicts far greater decreases in sensitivity. The evidence suggests that the mechanism(s) of adaptation include a change in the time-course of the rod's response. Human rods appear to adapt in much the same manner as do the rods of other vertebrates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8236849     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90027-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  36 in total

1.  Light adaptation and dark adaptation of human rod photoreceptors measured from the a-wave of the electroretinogram.

Authors:  M M Thomas; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Electroretinographic determination of human rod flash response in vivo.

Authors:  D R Pepperberg; D G Birch; D C Hood
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Time course of the flash response of dark- and light-adapted human rod photoreceptors derived from the electroretinogram.

Authors:  C Friedburg; M M Thomas; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Dynamic and steady-state light adaptation of mouse rod photoreceptors in vivo.

Authors:  G A Silva; J R Hetling; D R Pepperberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Excitation and desensitization of mouse rod photoreceptors in vivo following bright adapting light.

Authors:  Jennifer J Kang Derwent; Nasser M Qtaishat; David R Pepperberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Retinal sensitivity loss in third-generation n-3 PUFA-deficient rats.

Authors:  Harrison S Weisinger; James A Armitage; Brett G Jeffrey; Drake C Mitchell; Toru Moriguchi; Andrew J Sinclair; Richard S Weisinger; Norman Salem
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.880

7.  Development of receptoral responses in pigmented and albino guinea-pigs (Cavia porcellus).

Authors:  B V Bui; A J Vingrys
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Comparison of conventional ERG parameters and high-intensity A-wave analysis in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Michael F Marmor; Alexandra Serrato; Radouil Tzekov
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Lipofuscin accumulation, abnormal electrophysiology, and photoreceptor degeneration in mutant ELOVL4 transgenic mice: a model for macular degeneration.

Authors:  G Karan; C Lillo; Z Yang; D J Cameron; K G Locke; Y Zhao; S Thirumalaichary; C Li; D G Birch; H R Vollmer-Snarr; D S Williams; K Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Sampling and interpolation of the a-wave of the electroretinogram.

Authors:  John G Robson; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.