Literature DB >> 11433004

Time course of the flash response of dark- and light-adapted human rod photoreceptors derived from the electroretinogram.

C Friedburg1, M M Thomas, T D Lamb.   

Abstract

1. The a-wave of the electroretinogram was recorded from human subjects with normal vision, using a corneal electrode and ganzfeld stimulation. We applied the paired-flash technique, in which an intense 'probe' flash was delivered at different times after a 'test' flash. The amplitude of the probe-flash response provided a measure of the circulating current remaining at the appropriate time after the test flash. 2. We extended previous methods by measuring not at a fixed time, but at a range of times after the probe flash, and then calculating the ratio of the 'test-plus-probe' response to the 'probe-alone' response, as a function of time. 3. Under dark-adapted conditions the rod response derived by the paired-flash technique (in response to a relatively dim test flash) peaked at ca 120 ms, with a fractional sensitivity at the peak of ca 0.1 Td(-1) s(-1). 4. As reported previously, background illumination reduced the maximal response, reflecting a reduction in rod circulating current. In addition, it shortened the time to peak (to ca 70 ms at an intensity of 170 Td), and reduced the flash sensitivity measured at the peak. The flash sensitivity declined approximately according to Weber's Law, with a 10-fold reduction occurring at an intensity of 100-200 Td. We could not reliably measure responses at significantly higher background intensities because the circulating current became so small. 5. In order to investigate the phototransduction process after correction for response compression, we expressed the derived response as a fraction of the maximal response that could be elicited in the presence of the background. The earliest rising phase of this 'fractional response per unit intensity' was little affected by background illumination, suggesting that the amplification constant of transduction was unaltered by light adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11433004      PMCID: PMC2278688          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.t01-1-00217.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  41 in total

1.  Light adaptation and dark adaptation of human rod photoreceptors measured from the a-wave of the electroretinogram.

Authors:  M M Thomas; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  A quantitative measure of the electrical activity of human rod photoreceptors using electroretinography.

Authors:  D C Hood; D G Birch
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  An alternative phototransduction model for human rod and cone ERG a-waves: normal parameters and variation with age.

Authors:  A V Cideciyan; S G Jacobson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Recovery kinetics of human rod phototransduction inferred from the two-branched alpha-wave saturation function.

Authors:  D R Pepperberg; D G Birch; K P Hofmann; D C Hood
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Photoresponses of human rods in vivo derived from paired-flash electroretinograms.

Authors:  D R Pepperberg; D G Birch; D C Hood
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Human cone photoreceptor responses measured by the electroretinogram [correction of electoretinogram] a-wave during and after exposure to intense illumination.

Authors:  A A Paupoo; O A Mahroo; C Friedburg; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Light adaptation in cat retinal rods.

Authors:  T Tamura; K Nakatani; K W Yau
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Slowed recovery of rod photoresponse in mice lacking the GTPase accelerating protein RGS9-1.

Authors:  C K Chen; M E Burns; W He; T G Wensel; D A Baylor; M I Simon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Abnormal activation and inactivation mechanisms of rod transduction in patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa and the pro-23-his mutation.

Authors:  D G Birch; D C Hood; S Nusinowitz; D R Pepperberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Light adaptation in retinal rods of the rabbit and two other nonprimate mammals.

Authors:  K Nakatani; T Tamura; K W Yau
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  20 in total

1.  Excitation and desensitization of mouse rod photoreceptors in vivo following bright adapting light.

Authors:  Jennifer J Kang Derwent; Nasser M Qtaishat; David R Pepperberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Recovery of the human photopic electroretinogram after bleaching exposures: estimation of pigment regeneration kinetics.

Authors:  O A R Mahroo; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Contribution of cone photoreceptors and post-receptoral mechanisms to the human photopic electroretinogram.

Authors:  C Friedburg; C P Allen; P J Mason; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Extremely rapid recovery of human cone circulating current at the extinction of bleaching exposures.

Authors:  J S Kenkre; N A Moran; T D Lamb; O A R Mahroo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Light responses and light adaptation in rat retinal rods at different temperatures.

Authors:  S Nymark; H Heikkinen; C Haldin; K Donner; A Koskelainen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Dark adaptation of human rod bipolar cells measured from the b-wave of the scotopic electroretinogram.

Authors:  A M Cameron; O A R Mahroo; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  The neurovascular retina in retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Anne B Fulton; Ronald M Hansen; Anne Moskowitz; James D Akula
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 21.198

8.  Dark adaptation recovery of human rod bipolar cell response kinetics estimated from scotopic b-wave measurements.

Authors:  A M Cameron; L Miao; R Ruseckaite; M J Pianta; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Sampling and interpolation of the a-wave of the electroretinogram.

Authors:  John G Robson; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Contribution of voltage-gated sodium channels to the b-wave of the mammalian flash electroretinogram.

Authors:  Deb Kumar Mojumder; David M Sherry; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.