Literature DB >> 12015430

Excitation and desensitization of mouse rod photoreceptors in vivo following bright adapting light.

Jennifer J Kang Derwent1, Nasser M Qtaishat, David R Pepperberg.   

Abstract

Electroretinographic (ERG) methods were used to determine response properties of mouse rod photoreceptors in vivo following adapting illumination that produced a significant extent of rhodopsin bleaching. Bleaching levels prevailing at approximately 10 min and approximately 20 min after the adapting exposure were on average 14 % and 9 %, respectively, based on the analysis of visual cycle retinoids in the eye tissues. Recovery of the rod response to the adapting light was monitored by analysing the ERG a-wave response to a bright probe flash presented at varying times during dark adaptation. A paired-flash procedure, in which the probe flash was presented at defined times after a weak test flash of fixed strength, was used to determine sensitivity of the rod response to the test flash. Recovery of the response to the adapting light was 80 % complete at 13.5 +/- 3.0 min (mean +/- S.D.; n = 7) after adapting light offset. The adapting light caused prolonged desensitization of the weak-flash response derived from paired-flash data. By comparison with results obtained in the absence of the adapting exposure, desensitization determined with a test-probe interval of 80 ms was ~fourfold after 5 min of dark adaptation and approximately twofold after 20 min. The results indicate, for mouse rods in vivo, that the time scale for recovery of weak-flash sensitivity substantially exceeds that for the recovery of circulating current following significant rhodopsin bleaching. The lingering desensitization may reflect a reduced efficiency of signal transmission in the phototransduction cascade distinct from that due to residual excitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12015430      PMCID: PMC2290317          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  49 in total

1.  A quantitative account of the activation steps involved in phototransduction in amphibian photoreceptors.

Authors:  T D Lamb; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Bleached pigment activates transduction in isolated rods of the salamander retina.

Authors:  M C Cornwall; G L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-10-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The a-wave of the human electroretinogram recorded with a minimally invasive technique.

Authors:  N P Smith; T D Lamb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Mechanisms of rhodopsin inactivation in vivo as revealed by a COOH-terminal truncation mutant.

Authors:  J Chen; C L Makino; N S Peachey; D A Baylor; M I Simon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Transducin activation by the bovine opsin apoprotein.

Authors:  A Surya; K W Foster; B E Knox
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-03-10       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Dark adaptation of toad rod photoreceptors following small bleaches.

Authors:  C S Leibrock; T Reuter; T D Lamb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Analysis of ERG a-wave amplification and kinetics in terms of the G-protein cascade of phototransduction.

Authors:  M E Breton; A W Schueller; T D Lamb; E N Pugh
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Light adaptation of human rod receptors: the leading edge of the human a-wave and models of rod receptor activity.

Authors:  D C Hood; D G Birch
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Recovery phase of the murine rod photoresponse reconstructed from electroretinographic recordings.

Authors:  A L Lyubarsky; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Abnormal activation and inactivation mechanisms of rod transduction in patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa and the pro-23-his mutation.

Authors:  D G Birch; D C Hood; S Nusinowitz; D R Pepperberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  8 in total

1.  Contribution of cone photoreceptors and post-receptoral mechanisms to the human photopic electroretinogram.

Authors:  C Friedburg; C P Allen; P J Mason; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Mouse b-wave mutants.

Authors:  Machelle T Pardue; Neal S Peachey
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  An adaptive ERG technique to measure normal and altered dark adaptation in the mouse.

Authors:  Paul J DeMarco; Yoshiaki Katagiri; Volker Enzmann; Henry J Kaplan; Maureen A McCall
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Recovery of rod photoresponses in ABCR-deficient mice.

Authors:  Ambarish S Pawar; Nasser M Qtaishat; Deborah M Little; David R Pepperberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Deficient glucose and glutamine metabolism in Aralar/AGC1/Slc25a12 knockout mice contributes to altered visual function.

Authors:  Laura Contreras; Laura Ramirez; Jianhai Du; James B Hurley; Jorgina Satrústegui; Pedro de la Villa
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.367

6.  Restoration of high-sensitivity and adapting vision with a cone opsin.

Authors:  Michael H Berry; Amy Holt; Autoosa Salari; Julia Veit; Meike Visel; Joshua Levitz; Krisha Aghi; Benjamin M Gaub; Benjamin Sivyer; John G Flannery; Ehud Y Isacoff
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Results from screening over 9000 mutation-bearing mice for defects in the electroretinogram and appearance of the fundus.

Authors:  Lawrence H Pinto; Martha Hotz Vitaterna; Sanda M Siepka; Kazuhiro Shimomura; Stephen Lumayag; Matthew Baker; Deborah Fenner; Robert F Mullins; Val C Sheffield; Edwin M Stone; Edward Heffron; Joseph S Takahashi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Adaptive potentiation in rod photoreceptors after light exposure.

Authors:  Alex S McKeown; Timothy W Kraft
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.086

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.