Literature DB >> 11433003

Dynamic and steady-state light adaptation of mouse rod photoreceptors in vivo.

G A Silva1, J R Hetling, D R Pepperberg.   

Abstract

1. Electroretinographic (ERG) methods were used to investigate the effects of background illumination on the responses of mouse rod photoreceptors in vivo. A paired-flash procedure, involving the recording and analysis of the ERG a-wave response to a bright probe flash presented after a brief test flash, was used to derive the rod response to the test flash in steady background light. A related, step-plus-probe procedure was used to derive the step response of the rods to backgrounds of defined strength. 2. Steady background light produced a maintained derived response that was graded with background strength. Determinations of the full time course of the derived weak-flash response in steady background light, and of the effect of background strength on the flash response at fixed post-test-flash times, showed that moderate backgrounds reduce the peak amplitude and duration of the flash response. 3. The response to stepped onset of an approximately half-saturating background (1.2 sc cd m(-2)) exhibited a gradual rise over the first 200-300 ms, and an apparent subsequent relaxation to plateau amplitude within 1 s after background onset. Determinations of normalized amplitudes of the derived response to a test flash presented at 50 or 700 ms after background onset indicated substantial development of background-induced shortening of the test flash response within this 1 s period. These findings indicate a time scale of approximately 1 s or less for the near-completion of light adaptation at this background strength. 4. Properties of the derived response to a stepped background and to test flashes presented in steady background light are in general agreement with photocurrent data obtained from mammalian rods in vitro and suggest that the present results describe, to good approximation, the in vivo desensitization of mouse rods by background light.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11433003      PMCID: PMC2278692          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00203.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  35 in total

1.  Light adaptation and dark adaptation of human rod photoreceptors measured from the a-wave of the electroretinogram.

Authors:  M M Thomas; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Electroretinographic determination of human rod flash response in vivo.

Authors:  D R Pepperberg; D G Birch; D C Hood
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Responses of retinal rods to single photons.

Authors:  D A Baylor; T D Lamb; K W Yau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Phototransduction in transgenic mice after targeted deletion of the rod transducin alpha -subunit.

Authors:  P D Calvert; N V Krasnoperova; A L Lyubarsky; T Isayama; M Nicoló; B Kosaras; G Wong; K S Gannon; R F Margolskee; R L Sidman; E N Pugh; C L Makino; J Lem
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Photoreceptor light adaptation is mediated by cytoplasmic calcium concentration.

Authors:  H R Matthews; R L Murphy; G L Fain; T D Lamb
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-07-07       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Light adaptation in cat retinal rods.

Authors:  T Tamura; K Nakatani; K W Yau
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Calcium and light adaptation in retinal rods and cones.

Authors:  K Nakatani; K W Yau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-07-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Sensitivity and kinetics of mouse rod flash responses determined in vivo from paired-flash electroretinograms.

Authors:  J R Hetling; D R Pepperberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Cytoplasmic calcium as the messenger for light adaptation in salamander rods.

Authors:  G L Fain; T D Lamb; H R Matthews; R L Murphy
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  The photocurrent, noise and spectral sensitivity of rods of the monkey Macaca fascicularis.

Authors:  D A Baylor; B J Nunn; J L Schnapf
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  9 in total

1.  Excitation and desensitization of mouse rod photoreceptors in vivo following bright adapting light.

Authors:  Jennifer J Kang Derwent; Nasser M Qtaishat; David R Pepperberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Contribution of cone photoreceptors and post-receptoral mechanisms to the human photopic electroretinogram.

Authors:  C Friedburg; C P Allen; P J Mason; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Connexin 36 and rod bipolar cell independent rod pathways drive retinal ganglion cells and optokinetic reflexes.

Authors:  Cameron S Cowan; Muhammad Abd-El-Barr; Meike van der Heijden; Eric M Lo; David Paul; Debra E Bramblett; Janis Lem; David L Simons; Samuel M Wu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Light responses and light adaptation in rat retinal rods at different temperatures.

Authors:  S Nymark; H Heikkinen; C Haldin; K Donner; A Koskelainen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The scotopic electroretinogram of the sugar glider related to histological features of its retina.

Authors:  James D Akula; Tricia M Esdaille; A Romeo Caffé; Franklin Naarendorp
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Features of visual function in the naked mole-rat Heterocephalus glaber.

Authors:  John R Hetling; Monica S Baig-Silva; Christopher M Comer; Machelle T Pardue; Dalia Y Samaan; Nasser M Qtaishat; David R Pepperberg; Thomas J Park
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  A biomimetic fly photoreceptor model elucidates how stochastic adaptive quantal sampling provides a large dynamic range.

Authors:  Zhuoyi Song; Mikko Juusola
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Results from screening over 9000 mutation-bearing mice for defects in the electroretinogram and appearance of the fundus.

Authors:  Lawrence H Pinto; Martha Hotz Vitaterna; Sanda M Siepka; Kazuhiro Shimomura; Stephen Lumayag; Matthew Baker; Deborah Fenner; Robert F Mullins; Val C Sheffield; Edwin M Stone; Edward Heffron; Joseph S Takahashi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Experimentally derived model shows that adaptation acts as a powerful spatiotemporal filter of visual responses in the rat collicular neurons.

Authors:  Juntaute Bytautiene; Gytis Baranauskas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.