Literature DB >> 10381594

Light adaptation and dark adaptation of human rod photoreceptors measured from the a-wave of the electroretinogram.

M M Thomas1, T D Lamb.   

Abstract

1. We recorded the a-wave of the human electroretinogram from subjects with normal vision, using a corneal electrode and ganzfeld (full-field) light stimulation. From analysis of the rising phase of rod-isolated flash responses we determined the maximum size (amax) of the a-wave, a measure of the massed circulating current of the rods, and the amplification constant (A) of transduction within the rod photoreceptors. 2. During light adaptation by steady backgrounds the maximal response was reduced, as reported previously. amax declined approximately as I0/(I0 + IB), where IB is retinal illuminance and I0 is a constant. In different subjects I0 ranged from 40 to 100 trolands, with a mean of 70 trolands, corresponding to about 600 photoisomerizations s-1 per rod. (1 troland is the retinal illuminance that results when a surface luminance of 1 cd m-2 is viewed through a pupil area of 1 mm2.) The amplification constant A decreased only slightly in the presence of steady backgrounds. 3. Following a full bleach amax recovered along an S-shaped curve over a period of 30 min. There was no detectable response for the first 5 min, and half-maximal recovery took 13-17 min. 4. The apparent amplification constant decreased at early times after large bleaches. However, upon correction for reduced light absorption due to loss of pigment, with regeneration of rhodopsin occurring with a time constant of 9-15 min in different subjects, it appeared that the true value of A was probably unchanged by bleaching. 5. The recovery of amax following a bleach could be converted into recovery of equivalent background intensity, using a 'Crawford transformation' derived from the light adaptation results. Following bleaches ranging from 10 to > 99 %, the equivalent background intensity decayed approximately exponentially, with a time constant of about 3 min. 6. The time taken for amax to recover to a fixed proportion of its original level increased approximately linearly (rather than logarithmically) with fractional bleach, with a slope of about 12 min per 100 % bleach. Similar behaviour has previously been seen in psychophysical dark adaptation experiments, for the dependence of the 'second component' of recovery on the level of bleaching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10381594      PMCID: PMC2269441          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0479p.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  31 in total

1.  A quantitative measure of the electrical activity of human rod photoreceptors using electroretinography.

Authors:  D C Hood; D G Birch
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  THE INFLUENCE OF LIGHT ADAPTATION ON SUBSEQUENT DARK ADAPTATION OF THE EYE.

Authors:  S Hecht; C Haig; A M Chase
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1937-07-20       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 3.  Molecular basis of dark adaptation in rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  C S Leibrock; T Reuter; T D Lamb
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  An alternative phototransduction model for human rod and cone ERG a-waves: normal parameters and variation with age.

Authors:  A V Cideciyan; S G Jacobson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Effects of background light on the human dark-adapted electroretinogram and psychophysical threshold.

Authors:  L J Frishman; M G Reddy; J G Robson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Photoresponses of human rods in vivo derived from paired-flash electroretinograms.

Authors:  D R Pepperberg; D G Birch; D C Hood
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  Light adaptation in cat retinal rods.

Authors:  T Tamura; K Nakatani; K W Yau
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The involvement of rod photoreceptors in dark adaptation.

Authors:  T D Lamb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Analysis of ERG a-wave amplification and kinetics in terms of the G-protein cascade of phototransduction.

Authors:  M E Breton; A W Schueller; T D Lamb; E N Pugh
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Rod phototransduction in retinitis pigmentosa: estimation and interpretation of parameters derived from the rod a-wave.

Authors:  D C Hood; D G Birch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  44 in total

1.  Electroretinographic determination of human rod flash response in vivo.

Authors:  D R Pepperberg; D G Birch; D C Hood
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Normal light response, photoreceptor integrity, and rhodopsin dephosphorylation in mice lacking both protein phosphatases with EF hands (PPEF-1 and PPEF-2).

Authors:  P Ramulu; M Kennedy; W H Xiong; J Williams; M Cowan; D Blesh; K W Yau; J B Hurley; J Nathans
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Time course of the flash response of dark- and light-adapted human rod photoreceptors derived from the electroretinogram.

Authors:  C Friedburg; M M Thomas; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Dynamic and steady-state light adaptation of mouse rod photoreceptors in vivo.

Authors:  G A Silva; J R Hetling; D R Pepperberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Excitation and desensitization of mouse rod photoreceptors in vivo following bright adapting light.

Authors:  Jennifer J Kang Derwent; Nasser M Qtaishat; David R Pepperberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Recovery of the human photopic electroretinogram after bleaching exposures: estimation of pigment regeneration kinetics.

Authors:  O A R Mahroo; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Contribution of cone photoreceptors and post-receptoral mechanisms to the human photopic electroretinogram.

Authors:  C Friedburg; C P Allen; P J Mason; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Electroretinographic evaluation of the retinal S-cone system.

Authors:  Maja Sustar; Marko Hawlina; Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  A model of spectral filtering to reduce photochemical damage in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Sanford M Meyers; Mikhail A Ostrovsky; Robert F Bonner
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

10.  Sampling and interpolation of the a-wave of the electroretinogram.

Authors:  John G Robson; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.