Literature DB >> 8229817

Observations on human tactile directional sensibility.

H Olausson1, U Norrsell.   

Abstract

1. The ability to tell the direction of a motion across the skin deserve attention for being an easily observed function which provides a sensitive test for disturbances of the peripheral and central nervous systems. The mode of operation, on the other hand, of this tactile directional sensibility is still uncertain. 2. The dependence of directional sensibility on the contact load and distance of movement of a blunt metal tip, has now been determined for the skin of the forearm of normal subjects with the two-alternative forced-choice method. The testing was done under two conditions: elbow bent or straight. Straightening of the arm always reduced the accuracy of the directional sensibility. It also caused measurable changes of cutaneous mechanical properties, which presumably decreased the reliability of afferent information about lateral distension. 3. The average accuracy of the directional sensibility was found to be correlated linearly to the logarithm of the contact load, and straightening of the arm decreased the accuracy for each load by corresponding amounts. Similar relationships were found between the accuracy and the distance of movement. 4. Straightening of the arm did not cause any significant average reduction of the contact threshold for point stimulation of the same receptive field. A consistently lowered contact sensitivity, however, was observed for some of the subjects, which may have contributed to the reduction of the directional sensibility in these cases. 5. Correct directional estimations of the movement of the metal tip were obtained for a distance which was a fifth of the shortest distance for a corresponding estimation of the movement of a frictionless stimulus. The findings thus indicated that the friction between a moving object and the underlying skin, which can be mediated via stretch-sensitive cutaneous receptors, is critical for the determination of its direction of motion. 6. The present observations and previous observations by various authors are suggested to indicate that typical tactile directional sensibility depends on parallel processing of direction-selective data, and spatial data expressed as a function of time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8229817      PMCID: PMC1175401          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  14 in total

1.  Elastic properties of human skin: relation to age, sex, and anatomical region.

Authors:  A B Cua; K P Wilhelm; H I Maibach
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 2.  Skin bioengineering in the noninvasive assessment of cutaneous aging.

Authors:  E Berardesca; N Farinelli; G Rabbiosi; H I Maibach
Journal:  Dermatologica       Date:  1991

3.  Finger movement responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the dorsal skin of the human hand.

Authors:  B B Edin; J H Abbs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Human, tactile, directional sensibility and its peripheral origins.

Authors:  U Norrsell; H Olausson
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1992-02

5.  Defects in tactile directional sensitivity after forebrain commissurotomy in man.

Authors:  U Norrsell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-09-07       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Sensitive, objective procedure for evaluating response to light touch.

Authors:  R Sekuler; D Nash; R Armstrong
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Sensory functions which remain in man after complete transection of dorsal columns.

Authors:  P D Wall; W Noordenbos
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Agraphesthesia. A disorder of directional cutaneous kinesthesia or a disorientation in cutaneous space.

Authors:  M B Bender; C Stacy; J Cohen
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.181

9.  Factors affecting cutaneous mechanoreceptor response. I. Constant-force versus constant-displacement stimulation.

Authors:  B H Pubols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Factors influencing cutaneous directional sensitivity.

Authors:  D A Dreyer; M Hollins; B L Whitsel
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1978-06
View more
  6 in total

1.  The tactile integration of local motion cues is analogous to its visual counterpart.

Authors:  Y C Pei; S S Hsiao; S J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Tactile directional sensitivity and postural control.

Authors:  Helena Backlund Wasling; Ulf Norrsell; Karin Göthner; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spatial cues serving the tactile directional sensibility of the human forearm.

Authors:  U Norrsell; H Olausson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The effect of sound intensity on the audiotactile crossmodal dynamic capture effect.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  The neural basis of tactile motion perception.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Pei; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neural encoding of saltatory pneumotactile velocity in human glabrous hand.

Authors:  Hyuntaek Oh; Rebecca Custead; Yingying Wang; Steven Barlow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.