Literature DB >> 19011842

The effect of sound intensity on the audiotactile crossmodal dynamic capture effect.

Valeria Occelli1, Charles Spence, Massimiliano Zampini.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of varying sound intensity on the audiotactile crossmodal dynamic capture effect. Participants had to discriminate the direction of a target stream (tactile, Experiment 1; auditory, Experiment 2) while trying to ignore the direction of a distractor stream presented in a different modality (auditory, Experiment 1; tactile, Experiment 2). The distractor streams could either be spatiotemporally congruent or incongruent with respect to the target stream. In half of the trials, the participants were presented with auditory stimuli at 75 dB(A) while in the other half of the trials they were presented with auditory stimuli at 82 dB(A). Participants' performance on both tasks was significantly affected by the intensity of the sounds. Namely, the crossmodal capture of tactile motion by audition was stronger with the more intense (vs. less intense) auditory distractors (Experiment 1), whereas the capture effect exerted by the tactile distractors was stronger for less intense (than for more intense) auditory targets (Experiment 2). The crossmodal dynamic capture was larger in Experiment 1 than in Experiment 2, with a stronger congruency effect when the target streams were presented in the tactile (vs. auditory) modality. Two explanations are put forward to account for these results: an attentional biasing toward the more intense auditory stimuli, and a modulation induced by the relative perceptual weight of, respectively, the auditory and the tactile signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19011842     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1637-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

1.  Similarities between hearing and skin sensations.

Authors:  G VON BEKESY
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Hands help hearing: facilitatory audiotactile interaction at low sound-intensity levels.

Authors:  Martin Schürmann; Gina Caetano; Veikko Jousmäki; Riitta Hari
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  No direction-specific bimodal facilitation for audiovisual motion detection.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-04

5.  A comparison of auditory and visual apparent motion presented individually and with crossmodal moving distractors.

Authors:  Thomas Z Strybel; Argiro Vatakis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Tactile enhancement of auditory detection and perceived loudness.

Authors:  Helge Gillmeister; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Spatial attention and audiovisual interactions in apparent motion.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The use of transformations.

Authors:  M S BARTLETT
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1947-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Auditory apparent motion under binaural and monaural listening conditions.

Authors:  T Z Strybel; C L Manligas; D R Perrott
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-04

10.  Auditory and visual attention-based apparent motion share functional parallels.

Authors:  Wendy E Huddleston; James W Lewis; Raymond E Phinney; Edgar A DeYoe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-10
View more
  6 in total

1.  Sound enhances touch perception.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Johanan Hsu; Nafi E Yasar; L Caitlin Elmore; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

3.  Assessing the audiotactile Colavita effect in near and rear space.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Jess Hartcher O'Brien; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Auditory-Tactile integration: Effects of Phase of Sinusoidal Stimulation at 50 and 250 Hz.

Authors:  Parivash Ranjbar; E Courtenay Wilson; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida
Journal:  Int J Eng Technol Sci Innov       Date:  2016-04

5.  The leading sense: supramodal control of neurophysiological context by attention.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; Monica N O'Connell; Annamaria Barczak; Aimee Mills; Daniel C Javitt; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Multisensory interactions on auditory and somatosensory information in expert pianists.

Authors:  Masato Hirano; Shinichi Furuya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.