Literature DB >> 18524953

The tactile integration of local motion cues is analogous to its visual counterpart.

Y C Pei1, S S Hsiao, S J Bensmaia.   

Abstract

The visual and somatosensory systems have been shown to process spatial information similarly. Here we investigate tactile motion processing using stimuli whose perceptual properties have been well established in vision research, namely superimposed gratings (plaids), barber poles, and bar fields. In both modalities, information about stimulus motion (speed and direction) conveyed by neurons at low levels of sensory processing is ambiguous, a conundrum known as the aperture problem. Our results suggest that the tactile perception of motion, analogous to its visual counterpart, operates in multiple stages: first, the perceived direction of motion is determined by a majority vote from local motion detectors, which are subject to the aperture problem. As in vision, the conflict between the cues from terminators and other local motion cues is gradually resolved over time so that the perceived direction approaches the veridical direction of motion.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18524953      PMCID: PMC2430371          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0800028105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  28 in total

1.  Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion.

Authors:  S Shimojo; G H Silverman; K Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Representation of moving tactile stimuli in the somatic sensory cortex of awake monkeys.

Authors:  S Ruiz; P Crespo; R Romo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Observations on human tactile directional sensibility.

Authors:  H Olausson; U Norrsell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development.

Authors:  G C DeAngelis; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Local direction of edge motion causes and abolishes the barberpole illusion.

Authors:  F L Kooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Different motion sensitive units are involved in recovering the direction of moving lines.

Authors:  J Lorenceau; M Shiffrar; N Wells; E Castet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Spatial cues serving the tactile directional sensibility of the human forearm.

Authors:  U Norrsell; H Olausson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Tactile spatial resolution. III. A continuum mechanics model of skin predicting mechanoreceptor responses to bars, edges, and gratings.

Authors:  J R Phillips; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J A Movshon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Effects of traverse length on human perioral directional sensitivity.

Authors:  G K Essick; B L Whitsel; P J Dolan; D G Kelly
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.181

View more
  26 in total

1.  Motion-based prediction is sufficient to solve the aperture problem.

Authors:  Laurent U Perrinet; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Processing time of addition or withdrawal of single or combined balance-stabilizing haptic and visual information.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Oscar Crisafulli; Stefania Sozzi; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Neural Basis of Touch and Proprioception in Primate Cortex.

Authors:  Benoit P Delhaye; Katie H Long; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 9.090

Review 4.  The vision of Hsiao on somatosensation.

Authors:  Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Millisecond precision spike timing shapes tactile perception.

Authors:  Emily L Mackevicius; Matthew D Best; Hannes P Saal; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Correlated input reveals coexisting coding schemes in a sensory cortex.

Authors:  Luc Estebanez; Sami El Boustani; Alain Destexhe; Daniel E Shulz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Neural mechanisms of tactile motion integration in somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Pei; Steven S Hsiao; James C Craig; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Voluntary modification of rapid tactile-motor responses during reaching differs from its visuomotor counterpart.

Authors:  Sasha Reschechtko; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Shape invariant coding of motion direction in somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Pei; Steven S Hsiao; James C Craig; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 10.  Importance of spike timing in touch: an analogy with hearing?

Authors:  Hannes P Saal; Xiaoqin Wang; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.