Literature DB >> 7965863

Spatial cues serving the tactile directional sensibility of the human forearm.

U Norrsell1, H Olausson.   

Abstract

1. Tactile directional sensibility is considered to rely on the parallel processing of direction-contingent sensory data that depend on skin stretching caused by friction, and spatial cues that vary with time. A temperature-controlled airstream stimulus that prevented the activation of stretch receptors was used to investigate directional sensibility for the skin of the forearm. 2. The dependence on contact load and distance of movement was determined for normal subjects with a two-alternative forced-choice method. Testing was performed under two conditions, elbow bent or straight. Bracing the skin by straightening the arm did not alter the accuracy of the directional sensibility, in contrast to previous findings with stimuli that caused friction. 3. The accuracy of directional sensibility was correlated linearly to the logarithm of the distance of movement of the air jet. No correlation was found between accuracy and contact load, unlike findings with stimuli that cause friction. 4. Measurements were made with different subjects to determine the threshold distance at constant load. On average, subjects were able to distinguish direction with movements of < or = 8 mm. This acuity is sharper than has been reported with static stimuli. There was no correlation between subjects' threshold distances for judging direction and spatial acuity measured with absolute point localization. 5. The ability to distinguish direction was poor for the airstream stimulus compared with stimuli causing frictional contact with hairy skin. Nevertheless, the present findings are consistent with the suggestion that cutaneous spatial acuity is better for dynamic than for static stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7965863      PMCID: PMC1155673          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  13 in total

1.  Responses of human mechanoreceptive afferents to embossed dot arrays scanned across fingerpad skin.

Authors:  J R Phillips; R S Johansson; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Defects in tactile directional sensitivity after forebrain commissurotomy in man.

Authors:  U Norrsell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-09-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Sensitive, objective procedure for evaluating response to light touch.

Authors:  R Sekuler; D Nash; R Armstrong
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Sensory functions which remain in man after complete transection of dorsal columns.

Authors:  P D Wall; W Noordenbos
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Observations on human tactile directional sensibility.

Authors:  H Olausson; U Norrsell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Sensitivity to shifts of a point stimulus: an instance of tactile hyperacuity.

Authors:  J M Loomis; C C Collins
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-12

7.  Agraphesthesia. A disorder of directional cutaneous kinesthesia or a disorientation in cutaneous space.

Authors:  M B Bender; C Stacy; J Cohen
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.181

8.  Tactile receptor discharge and mechanical properties of glabrous skin.

Authors:  B H Pubols; L M Pubols
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1983-06

9.  Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition.

Authors:  K O Johnson; J R Phillips
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The utility of testing tactile perception of direction of scratch as a sensitive clinical sign of posterior column dysfunction in spinal cord disorders.

Authors:  G J Hankey; R H Edis
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  7 in total

1.  Functional role of unmyelinated tactile afferents in human hairy skin: sympathetic response and perceptual localization.

Authors:  Håkan Olausson; Jonathan Cole; Karin Rylander; Francis McGlone; Yves Lamarre; B Gunnar Wallin; Heidrun Krämer; Johan Wessberg; Mikael Elam; M Catherine Bushnell; Ake Vallbo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The tactile integration of local motion cues is analogous to its visual counterpart.

Authors:  Y C Pei; S S Hsiao; S J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cortical processing of lateral skin stretch stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Helena Backlund Wasling; Linda Lundblad; Line Löken; Johan Wessberg; Katarina Wiklund; Ulf Norrsell; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Tactile directional sensitivity and postural control.

Authors:  Helena Backlund Wasling; Ulf Norrsell; Karin Göthner; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Receptive field characteristics of tactile units with myelinated afferents in hairy skin of human subjects.

Authors:  A B Vallbo; H Olausson; J Wessberg; N Kakuda
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Feeling good: on the role of C fiber mediated touch in interoception.

Authors:  M Björnsdotter; I Morrison; H Olausson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Functional Connectivity Evoked by Orofacial Tactile Perception of Velocity.

Authors:  Yingying Wang; Fatima Sibaii; Rebecca Custead; Hyuntaek Oh; Steven M Barlow
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.