Literature DB >> 8226333

Effects of atmospheric pressure variation on spontaneous, transiently evoked, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal human ears.

R Hauser1, R Probst, F P Harris.   

Abstract

The effects of atmospheric pressure changes on the frequency and amplitude of spontaneous (SOAEs), transiently evoked (TEOAEs) and distortion product (DPOAEs) otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans were compared. The purpose was to determine if the transmission of each form of OAE was influenced differently by the middle ear. Sixty-one subjects were tested in a pressure chamber. Twenty-seven SOAEs with a frequency range between 535 to 4729 Hz from 21 subjects were examined. Transiently evoked OAEs were studied in 20 subjects using clicks and tone-bursts at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz. Distortion-product OAEs were generated at seven geometric mean frequencies between 1 and 8 kHz in another 20 subjects. Spontaneous OAEs were examined by applying atmospheric pressure up to 9 kPa and down to -2.5 kPa, for the measurement of TEOAEs and DPOAEs the pressure was varied from 0 kPa up to 8 kPa. In spite of large interindividual differences, results suggest that the influence of pressure on the three OAEs is frequency specific. The frequency and amplitude change of SOAEs, the modification of the amplitude and spectra of TEOAEs, and the amplitude change of DPOAEs are more influenced by changes in middle ear pressure below 4 kHz than are OAEs in the range at 4 kHz and above.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8226333     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90101-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  14 in total

1.  Spontaneous basilar membrane oscillation and otoacoustic emission at 15 kHz in a guinea pig.

Authors:  A L Nuttall; K Grosh; J Zheng; E de Boer; Y Zou; T Ren
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

2.  Posture-induced changes in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and the potential for noninvasive monitoring of changes in intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Susan E Voss; Nicholas J Horton; Taronne H P Tabucchi; Fopefolu O Folowosele; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Long-term stability of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Edward M Burns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: frequency modulation.

Authors:  Lin Bian
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Tinnitus after head injury: evidence from otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  B J Ceranic; D K Prasher; E Raglan; L M Luxon
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The effects of air pressure on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions of lizards.

Authors:  Pim van Dijk; Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-09

8.  Pressurized transient otoacoustic emissions measured using click and chirp stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Chris A Sanford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Influence of static middle ear pressure on transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.

Authors:  P K Plinkert; F Bootz; T Vossieck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Posture systematically alters ear-canal reflectance and DPOAE properties.

Authors:  Susan E Voss; Modupe F Adegoke; Nicholas J Horton; Kevin N Sheth; Jonathan Rosand; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.