Literature DB >> 19045788

Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: frequency modulation.

Lin Bian1.   

Abstract

It was previously reported that low-frequency biasing of cochlear structures can suppress and modulate the amplitudes of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) in humans [Bian, L. and Watts, K. L. (2008). "Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: Amplitude modulation," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 887-898]. In addition to amplitude modulation, the bias tone produced an upward shift of the SOAE frequency and a frequency modulation. These frequency effects usually occurred prior to significant modifications of SOAE amplitudes and were dependent on the relative strength of the bias tone and a particular SOAE. The overall SOAE frequency shifts were usually less than 2%. A quasistatic modulation pattern showed that biasing in either positive or negative pressure direction increased SOAE frequency. The instantaneous SOAE frequency revealed a "W-shaped" modulation pattern within one biasing cycle. The SOAE frequency was maximal at the biasing extremes and minimized at the zero crossings of the bias tone. The temporal modulation of SOAE frequency occurred with a short delay. These static and dynamic effects indicate that modifications of the mechanical properties of the cochlear transducer could underlie the frequency shift and modulation. These biasing effects are consistent with the suppression and modulation of SOAE amplitude due to shifting of the cochlear transducer operating point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19045788      PMCID: PMC2677352          DOI: 10.1121/1.2990716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  51 in total

1.  Physiological and morphological characterization of efferent neurones in the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  D Robertson; M Gummer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions created through the interaction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and externally generated tones.

Authors:  L W Norrix; T J Glattke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Relaxation dynamics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions perturbed by external tones. II. Suppression of interacting emissions.

Authors:  W J Murphy; A Tubis; C L Talmadge; G R Long
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temperature dependency of the frequency and level of a spontaneous otoacoustic emission during fever.

Authors:  A J O'Brien
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1994 Aug-Oct

Review 5.  Gating-spring models of mechanoelectrical transduction by hair cells of the internal ear.

Authors:  V S Markin; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  1995

6.  New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; G R Long; W J Murphy; A Tubis
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Correlation between amplitude and frequency fluctuations of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  P van Dijk; H P Wit; A Tubis; C L Talmadge; G R Long
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Heart beat modulation of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in guinea pig.

Authors:  T Ren; M Zhang; A L Nuttall; J M Miller
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Functional asymmetry of medial olivocochlear system in humans. Towards a peripheral auditory lateralization.

Authors:  S Khalfa; L Collet
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-04-10       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Suppression tuning curves for spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in infants and adults.

Authors:  J Y Bargones; E M Burns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Aftereffects of Intense Low-Frequency Sound on Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions: Effect of Frequency and Level.

Authors:  Lena Jeanson; Lutz Wiegrebe; Robert Gürkov; Eike Krause; Markus Drexl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-19

2.  Low-frequency sound affects active micromechanics in the human inner ear.

Authors:  Kathrin Kugler; Lutz Wiegrebe; Benedikt Grothe; Manfred Kössl; Robert Gürkov; Eike Krause; Markus Drexl
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.963

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.