Literature DB >> 8202481

Linker DNA accessibility in chromatin fibers of different conformations: a reevaluation.

J Zlatanova1, S H Leuba, G Yang, C Bustamante, K van Holde.   

Abstract

New studies on chromatin fiber morphology, using the technique of scanning force microscopy (SFM), have caused us to reexamine recent analysis of nuclease digestion of chromatin. Chicken erythrocyte chromatin fibers, glutaraldehyde-fixed at 0, 10, and 80 mM NaCl, were imaged with the help of SFM. The chromatin fibers possessed a loose three-dimensional 30-nm structure even in the absence of added salt. This structure slightly condensed upon addition of 10 mM NaCl, and highly compacted, irregularly segmented fibers were observed at 80 mM NaCl. This sheds new light upon our previously reported analysis of the kinetics of digestion by soluble and membrane-immobilized micrococcal nuclease [Leuba, S. H., Zlatanova, J. & van Holde, K. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 235, 871-880]. While the low-ionic-strength fibers were readily digested, the highly compacted structure formed at 80 mM NaCl was refractory to nuclease attack, implying that the linkers were fully accessible in the low-ionic-strength conformation but not in the condensed fibers. We now find that cleavage of the linker DNA by a small molecule, methidiumpropyl-EDTA-Fe(II), proceeds for all types of conformations at similar rates. Thus, steric hindrance is responsible for the lack of accessibility to micrococcal nuclease in the condensed fiber. Taken in total the data suggest that reexamination of existing models of chromatin conformation is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8202481      PMCID: PMC43977          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  Nonenzymatic cleavage of chromatin.

Authors:  I L Cartwright; S C Elgin
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Salt-induced release of DNA from nucleosome core particles.

Authors:  T D Yager; C T McMurray; K E van Holde
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1989-03-07       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Accessibility of the globular domain of histones H1 and H5 to antibodies upon folding of chromatin.

Authors:  V R Russanova; S I Dimitrov; V L Makarov; I G Pashev
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1987-09-01

4.  The complete sequence of a chromosomal mouse alpha--globin gene reveals elements conserved throughout vertebrate evolution.

Authors:  Y Nishioka; P Leder
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  A chromatin folding model that incorporates linker variability generates fibers resembling the native structures.

Authors:  C L Woodcock; S A Grigoryev; R A Horowitz; N Whitaker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  On the location of linker DNA in the chromatin fiber. Studies with immobilized and soluble micrococcal nuclease.

Authors:  S H Leuba; J Zlatanova; K van Holde
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-01-21       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Salt induced transitions of chromatin core particles studied by tyrosine fluorescence anisotropy.

Authors:  L J Libertini; E W Small
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1980-08-25       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Cleavage of DNA with methidiumpropyl-EDTA-iron(II): reaction conditions and product analyses.

Authors:  R P Hertzberg; P B Dervan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1984-08-14       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Transitions between in situ and isolated chromatin.

Authors:  P J Giannasca; R A Horowitz; C L Woodcock
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin.

Authors:  F Thoma; T Koller; A Klug
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  20 in total

1.  Pulling a single chromatin fiber reveals the forces that maintain its higher-order structure.

Authors:  Y Cui; C Bustamante
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Circle ligation of in vitro assembled chromatin indicates a highly flexible structure.

Authors:  A Stein; Y Dalal; T J Fleury
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Optical tweezers stretching of chromatin.

Authors:  Lisa H Pope; Martin L Bennink; Jan Greve
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 4.  Stretching and imaging single DNA molecules and chromatin.

Authors:  Jordanka Zlatanova; Sanford H Leuba
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Structural elements of bulk chromatin within metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Caravaca; Silvia Caño; Isaac Gállego; Joan-Ramon Daban
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 6.  The end adjusts the means: heterochromatin remodelling during terminal cell differentiation.

Authors:  Sergei A Grigoryev; Yaroslava A Bulynko; Evgenya Y Popova
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Dense chromatin plates in metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  Isaac Gállego; Pablo Castro-Hartmann; Juan Manuel Caravaca; Silvia Caño; Joan-Ramon Daban
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 1.733

8.  Diffusion-enhanced resonance energy transfer shows that linker-DNA accessibility decreases during salt-induced chromatin condensation.

Authors:  R Labarbe; S Mignon; S Flock; C Houssier
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Biological scanning probe microscopy comes of age.

Authors:  S M Lindsay
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Co-operative interactions of oligonucleosomal DNA with the H1e histone variant and its poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated isoform.

Authors:  M D'erme; G Zardo; A Reale; P Caiafa
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.