Literature DB >> 8199107

Compared optical performances of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity)

W Williamson1, L Poirier, P Coulon, P Verin.   

Abstract

The functional results (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity) of 19 multifocal (3M design) and 14 all polymethylmethacrylate biconvex monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs), 6 mm in optical diameter were compared. Best corrected visual acuity was > or = 8/10 (Monoyer chart) Parinaud 2 in all cases. Major differences of functional performance in favour of monofocal IOLs were found outside standard conditions of vision (low contrast and illumination levels). A significant difference in contrast sensitivity was found for each spatial frequency in favour of multifocal IOLs (0.0016 < p < 0.05). Mesopic vision was statistically higher in the monofocal IOL group (p = 0.0015). Moreover, dynamic visual acuity allowed accurate evaluation of the difference in performance between these two models of implant. In view of these results multifocal IOLs should be reserved for patients with normal psychosensitive adaptation; an ocular pathology that could alter contrast sensitivity or mesopic vision is a contraindication for multifocal IOLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8199107      PMCID: PMC504756          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.78.4.249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  5 in total

1.  [A good vision in spite of a multifocal implant?].

Authors:  J P Nordmann
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 0.818

2.  Contrast sensitivity in patients with a new type of multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  T Olsen; L Corydon
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  [Comparative study of 2 types of bifocal implants by measurement of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity].

Authors:  P Bonnet; A Robinet; J Colin
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 0.818

4.  Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function.

Authors:  D Regan; D Neima
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Food and Drug Administration study update. One-year results from 671 patients with the 3M multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  R L Lindstrom
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 12.079

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Hikaru Ito; Yukari Ohori; Yui Takano; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Contrast sensitivity after extracapsular and intracapsular cataract extraction.

Authors:  E K Mela; J X Koliopoulos; N M Pharmakakis; S P Gartaganis
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Tritan colour contrast sensitivity function in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  S Pieh; G Hanselmayer; B Lackner; P Marvan; A Grechenig; H Weghaupt; C Vass; C Skorpik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  S Pieh; B Lackner; G Hanselmayer; R Zöhrer; M Sticker; H Weghaupt; A Fercher; C Skorpik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.638

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.