Literature DB >> 6657195

Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function.

D Regan, D Neima.   

Abstract

Visual pathway disorders can cause visual loss that is not detected by the Snellen test: visual sensitivity to coarse detail may be depressed, even when visual sensitivity to fine detail is unaffected. Sinewave grating test targets can detect such hidden visual loss. However, electronic apparatus for generating sinewave gratings is expensive, while the inexpensive Arden plates provide no check on the patient's accuracy. We have tested 10 patients and 10 control subjects with a set of five letter charts (including the standard Snellen chart). These letter charts were of different contrasts, namely 10%, 22%, 31%, 64% and 93%, but otherwise were substantially alike. Subjects were also tested with sinewave gratings. We found good agreement between sinewave grating and letter chart findings. In particular, the charts picked up visual loss that was not detected by the standard Snellen chart: they detected visual pathway dysfunction in all seven patients whose sinewave data were abnormal. Our findings suggest that even one low-contrast letter chart could provide a valuable supplement to the standard Snellen chart. Compared with other available devices, these charts have the advantages of cheapness, simplicity and of providing the ophthalmologist with an immediate check on patients' accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6657195     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(83)34407-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  23 in total

Review 1.  Why HID headlights bother older drivers.

Authors:  M A Mainster; G T Timberlake
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Peripheral contrast sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  F Falcão-Reis; E O'Donoghue; R Buceti; R A Hitchings; G B Arden
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Low-contrast visual acuity cards in pediatric ophthalmology.

Authors:  T D France; L W France
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity function using contrast sweep visual evoked responses.

Authors:  J M Lopes de Faria; O Katsumi; M Arai; T Hirose
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Higher-contrast requirements for recognizing low-pass-filtered letters.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  CMSS-VEPs: contrast modulated steady state visual evoked potentials: its neuronal origin and clinical use.

Authors:  W Spileers; G A Orban; H Maes; L Missotten
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 7.  Vision.

Authors:  J F Acheson; M D Sanders
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Compared optical performances of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity)

Authors:  W Williamson; L Poirier; P Coulon; P Verin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Low-contrast letter charts in early diabetic retinopathy, ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  D Regan; D Neima
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Factors affecting crowded acuity: eccentricity and contrast.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Jeremy M Chin; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.