Literature DB >> 10431796

Contrast sensitivity after extracapsular and intracapsular cataract extraction.

E K Mela1, J X Koliopoulos, N M Pharmakakis, S P Gartaganis.   

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity function after cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation has been mainly correlated to the type or the material of the intraocular lens. Our purpose was to identify other possible factors, like posterior capsule, to contrast sensitivity alterations after cataract surgery, comparing patients operated for cataract by techniques that mainly differed on the posterior capsule's integrity. The intraocular lens implanted was either a posterior or an anterior chamber one, always monofocal and made of PMMA. We measured contrast sensitivity function at four spatial frequencies in two groups of operated individuals (group A and B) and in one group of healthy control individuals. Each group consisted of 42 eyes. Group A comprised eyes with intact, clear posterior capsule and posterior chamber monofocal intraocular lens. Group B comprised eyes with ruptured or removed posterior capsule and anterior chamber monofocal intraocular lens. Control group comprised healthy control eyes. A pair matched design was used to compare contrast sensitivity values among the individuals of the three groups. No statistically significant differences in contrast sensitivity values were found when group B patients were compared to healthy controls (p >0.05). Patients of group A exhibited contrast sensitivity function impairment at intermediate and high spatial frequencies when compared to patients of group B (p <0.05) and to controls (p <0.01). It seems that intact posterior capsule provides inferior visual function, in spite of relatively good visual acuity and apparently satisfactory results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10431796     DOI: 10.1023/a:1001750105995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  29 in total

1.  The optical design of intraocular lens implants.

Authors:  R D Binkhorst
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1975

2.  Diabetic retinopathy viewed as a neurosensory disorder.

Authors:  G H Bresnick
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-07

3.  Contrast sensitivity and acuity relationship in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  M Abrahamsson; J Sjöstrand
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Night driving: effects of glare from vehicle headlights on motion perception.

Authors:  S J Anderson; I E Holliday
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  [Modulation transfer function and contrast sensitivity of refractive multi-zone multi-focal lenses].

Authors:  D Eisenmann; V Hessemer; B Manzke; W Stork; K W Jacobi
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Comparison of the optical and visual quality of poly(methyl methacrylate) and silicone intraocular lenses.

Authors:  M C Knorz; A Lang; T C Hsia; B Poepel; V Seiberth; H Liesenhoff
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Food and Drug Administration study update. One-year results from 671 patients with the 3M multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  R L Lindstrom
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Contrast and glare sensitivity. Association with the type and severity of the cataract.

Authors:  M S Lasa; M B Datiles; M J Podgor; B V Magno
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Contrast sensitivity and reading through multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  H Akutsu; G E Legge; M Showalter; R L Lindstrom; R W Zabel; V M Kirby
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.