Literature DB >> 11423456

Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

S Pieh1, B Lackner, G Hanselmayer, R Zöhrer, M Sticker, H Weghaupt, A Fercher, C Skorpik.   

Abstract

AIMS: To calculate the diameter of halos perceived by patients with multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and to stimulate halos in patients with refractive multifocal IOLs in a clinical experiment.
METHODS: Calculations were done to show the diameter of halos in the case of the bifocal intraocular lens. 24 patients with a refractive multifocal IOLs and five patients with a monofocal IOL were asked about their subjective observation of halos and were included in a clinical experiment using a computer program (Glare & Halo, FW Fitzke and C Lohmann, Tomey AG) which simulates a light source of 0.15 square degrees (sq deg) in order to stimulate and measure halos. Halo testing took place monoculary, under mesopic conditions through the distance and the near focus of the multifocal lens and through the focus of the monofocal lens.
RESULTS: The halo diameter depends on the pupil diameter, the refractive power of the cornea, and distance focus of the multifocal IOL as well as the additional lens power for the near focus. 23 out of 24 patients with a refractive multifocal IOL described halos at night when looking at a bright light source. Only one patient was disturbed by the appearance of halos. Under test conditions, halos were detected in all patients with a refractive multifocal IOL. The halo area testing through the distance focus was 1.05 sq deg +/- 0.41, through the near focus 1.07 sq deg +/- 0.49 and in the monofocal lens 0.26 sq deg +/- 0.13.
CONCLUSIONS: Under high contrast conditions halos can be stimulated in all patients with multifocal intraocular lenses. The halo size using the distance or the near focus is identical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11423456      PMCID: PMC1724058          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.85.7.816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  32 in total

1.  Binocular function after bilateral implantation of monofocal and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  B Arens; N Freudenthaler; C D Quentin
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Explantation of 3M diffractive intraocular lenses.

Authors:  F T Ellingson
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Contrast sensitivity as a function of focus in patients with the diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  T Olsen; L Corydon
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Personal results with the 3M diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  F Goes
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Optical performance of multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  J T Holladay; H Van Dijk; A Lang; V Portney; T R Willis; R Sun; H C Oksman
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Prospectively randomized trial comparing the pseudoaccommodation of the AMO ARRAY multifocal lens and a monofocal lens.

Authors:  S P Percival; S S Setty
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Contrast sensitivity in multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  G Ravalico; F Baccara; G Rinaldi
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  [Properties of injectable intraocular lenses].

Authors:  J Reiner; L Speicher
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 0.700

9.  Food and Drug Administration study update. One-year results from 671 patients with the 3M multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  R L Lindstrom
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Comparison of depth of focus and low-contrast acuities for monofocal versus multifocal intraocular lens patients at 1 year.

Authors:  C T Post
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  29 in total

1.  Quality of vision, patient satisfaction and long-term visual function after bilateral implantation of a low addition multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Emilio Pedrotti; Rodolfo Mastropasqua; Jacopo Bonetto; Christian Demasi; Francesco Aiello; Carlo Nucci; Cesare Mariotti; Giorgio Marchini
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  All-distance visual acuity in eyes with a nontinted or a yellow-tinted diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Miki Masumoto; Hideyuki Hayashi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Initial results of trifocal diffractive IOL implantation.

Authors:  Anna Voskresenskaya; Nadezhda Pozdeyeva; Nicolay Pashtaev; Yevgeniy Batkov; Valeriy Treushnicov; Valentin Cherednik
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Implantation of refractive multifocal intraocular lens with a surface-embedded near section for cataract eyes complicated with a coexisting ocular pathology.

Authors:  M Ouchi; S Kinoshita
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  [Functional results with two multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOL). Array SA40 versus Acri.Twin].

Authors:  U Mester; P Dillinger; N Anterist; H Kaymak
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  [Effect of intrastromal correction of presbyopia with femtosecond laser (INTRACOR) on mesopic contrast sensitivity].

Authors:  A Fitting; N Menassa; G U Auffarth; M P Holzer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Can we measure mesopic pupil size with the cobalt blue light slit-lamp biomicroscopy method?

Authors:  Miguel J Maldonado; Alberto López-Miguel; David P Piñero; José R Juberías; Juan C Nieto; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  [Functional vision training after MIOL implantation].

Authors:  U Mester; M Fahle; G Ott; H Kaymak
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  [Subjective and objective outcome following implantation of the apodized diffractive AcrySof ReSTOR].

Authors:  K Petermeier; P Szurman
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Maria A Woodward; J Bradley Randleman; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.