Literature DB >> 11423455

Tritan colour contrast sensitivity function in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

S Pieh1, G Hanselmayer, B Lackner, P Marvan, A Grechenig, H Weghaupt, C Vass, C Skorpik.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare tritan colour contrast sensitivity (CCS), without and with glare, in patients with refractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and with monofocal intraocular lenses.
METHODS: Tritan CCS was determined (Moorfields Vision System, CH Electronics) in 15 eyes (14 patients, 75.7 (+/-6.6) years) with a refractive multifocal IOL (Allergan SA 40N) and in 11 eyes (10 patients, 73.7 (+/-6.4) years) with a monofocal IOL (Allergan SI 40 NB). Measurements were made monocularly under mesopic conditions at a distance of 2 metres from the monitor with best distance refraction plus 0.5 D at 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 11.4, and 22.8 cycles per degree (cpd). The test was then repeated for the multifocal IOLs, adding minus 2.5 D to the best distance refraction to force the patient to use the near focus. Both lenses were also investigated under glare conditions with the same set-up and using the brightness acuity tester (BAT).
RESULTS: The tritan CCS function without glare in multifocal lenses through the distance focus was nearly identical to that through the near focus. The following statistically significant differences were measured: the CCS function without glare for the multifocal lens was worse at 0.5 cpd and 1.0 cpd than that of the monofocal lens. In CCS testing of the multifocal group with glare at 6 cpd, the results through the distance focus were better than the results through the near focus. For the CCS function with glare, the values for the distance focus in the multifocal lens were worse than the values for the monofocal lens at 0.5 cpd and 1 cpd. In CCS testing with glare through the near focus and CCS testing through the monofocal lens, the monofocal lens performed better at 0.5 cpd, 1 cpd, 3 cpd, and 6 cpd.
CONCLUSION: Refractive multifocal intraocular lenses influence tritan CCS function compared to monofocal lenses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11423455      PMCID: PMC1724048          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.85.7.811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  30 in total

1.  [Visual acuity and use of eyeglasses after implantation of a diffractive multifocal lens].

Authors:  S Pieh; H Weghaupt; G Rainer; C Skorpik
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 0.700

2.  Personal results with the 3M diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  F Goes
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Visual function with monofocal versus multifocal IOLs.

Authors:  M Vaquero; J L Encinas; F Jimenez
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Visual properties of the foldable Array multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  H Weghaupt; S Pieh; C Skorpik
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Compared optical performances of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity)

Authors:  W Williamson; L Poirier; P Coulon; P Verin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  [Modulation transfer function and contrast sensitivity of refractive multi-zone multi-focal lenses].

Authors:  D Eisenmann; V Hessemer; B Manzke; W Stork; K W Jacobi
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Interpreting multifocal intraocular lens modulation transfer functions.

Authors:  A Lang; V Portney
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Food and Drug Administration study update. One-year results from 671 patients with the 3M multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  R L Lindstrom
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  [Effect of diffractive multi-focal lenses on contrast vision, glare sensitivity and color vision].

Authors:  K Rüther; D Eisenmann; E Zrenner; K W Jacobi
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 0.700

10.  Comparison of depth of focus and low-contrast acuities for monofocal versus multifocal intraocular lens patients at 1 year.

Authors:  C T Post
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.