Literature DB >> 10087863

The prototype effect in face recognition: extension and limits.

R Cabeza1, V Bruce, T Kato, M Oda.   

Abstract

The prototype effect in face recognition refers to a tendency to recognize the face corresponding to the central value of a series of seen faces, even when this central value or prototype has not been seen. Five experiments investigated the extension and limits of this phenomenon. In all the experiments, participants saw a series of faces, each one in two or more different versions or exemplars, and then performed a recognition test, including seen and unseen exemplars and the unseen prototype face. In Experiment 1, a strong prototype effect for variations in feature location was demonstrated in oldness ratings and in a standard old/new recognition test. Experiments 2A and 2B compared the prototype effect for variations in feature location and variations in head angle and showed that, for the latter, the prototype effect was weaker and more dependent on similarity than for the former. These results suggest that recognition across feature variations is based on an averaging mechanism, whereas recognition across viewpoint variations is based on an approximation mechanism. Experiments 3A and 3B examined the limits of the prototype effect using a face morphing technique that allows a systematic manipulation of face similarity. The results indicated that, as the similarity between face exemplars decreases to the level of similarity between the faces of different individuals, the prototype effect starts to disappear. At the same time, the prototype effect may originate false memories of faces that were never seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10087863     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  Illusory memories in amnesic patients: conceptual and perceptual false recognition.

Authors:  D L Schacter; M Verfaellie; M D Anes
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.

Authors:  J DEESE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-07

3.  Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces.

Authors:  J R Vokey; J D Read
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-05

4.  Remembering facial configurations.

Authors:  V Bruce; T Doyle; N Dench; M Burton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1991-02

5.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition.

Authors:  H H Bülthoff; S Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  T Poggio; S Edelman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  On the genesis of abstract ideas.

Authors:  M I Posner; S W Keele
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-07

9.  Stability from variation: the case of face recognition. The M.D. Vernon Memorial Lecture.

Authors:  V Bruce
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1994-02

10.  Influence of manipulated category knowledge on prototype classification and recognition.

Authors:  D Homa; B Goldhardt; L Burruel-Homa; J C Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-07
View more
  6 in total

1.  The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  F Christie; V Bruce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

2.  Greater visual averaging of face identity for own-gender faces.

Authors:  Jan W de Fockert; Ben Gautrey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

3.  Tracking the emergence of memories: A category-learning paradigm to explore schema-driven recognition.

Authors:  Felipe De Brigard; Timothy F Brady; Luka Ruzic; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-01

4.  When prototypes are not best: judgments made by children with autism.

Authors:  Catherine J Molesworth; Dermot M Bowler; James A Hampton
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2008-04-10

5.  How category structure influences the perception of object similarity: the atypicality bias.

Authors:  James William Tanaka; Justin Kantner; Marni Bartlett
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-06-06

6.  Music Communicates Affects, Not Basic Emotions - A Constructionist Account of Attribution of Emotional Meanings to Music.

Authors:  Julian Cespedes-Guevara; Tuomas Eerola
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.