Literature DB >> 8934690

Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification.

N P Costen1, D M Parker, I Craw.   

Abstract

If face images are degraded by block averaging, there is a nonlinear decline in recognition accuracy as block size increases, suggesting that identification requires a critical minimum range of object spatial frequencies. The identification of faces was measured with equivalent Fourier low-pass filtering and block averaging preserving the same information and with high-pass transformations. In Experiment 1, accuracy declined and response time increased in a significant nonlinear manner in all cases as the spatial-frequency range was reduced. However, it did so at a faster rate for the quantized and high-passed images. A second experiment controlled for the differences in the contrast of the high-pass faces and found a reduced but significant and nonlinear decline in performance as the spatial-frequency range was reduced. These data suggest that face identification is preferentially supported by a band of spatial frequencies of approximately 8-16 cycles per face; contrast or line-based explanations were found to be inadequate. The data are discussed in terms of current models of face identification.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8934690     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  19 in total

1.  Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces.

Authors:  J R Vokey; J D Read
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-05

2.  Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of high and low spatial frequencies: a facial recognition task.

Authors:  P A Keenan; R D Whitman; J Pepe
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Recognition of positive and negative bandpass-filtered images.

Authors:  T Hayes; M C Morrone; D C Burr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Further analyses of masking functions in laterality studies of face-recognition.

Authors:  M Moscovitch
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  The recognition of faces.

Authors:  L D Harmon
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.142

6.  Masking in visual recognition: effects of two-dimensional filtered noise.

Authors:  L D Harmon; B Julesz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Spatial content and spatial quantisation effects in face recognition.

Authors:  N P Costen; D M Parker; I Craw
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Added noise restores recognizability of coarse quantized images.

Authors:  M C Morrone; D C Burr; J Ross
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Sep 15-21       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  46 in total

1.  Spatial frequencies in short-term memory for faces: a test of three frequency-dependent hypotheses.

Authors:  M J Wenger; J T Townsend
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

Review 2.  Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes.

Authors:  D J Morrison; P G Schyns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

Review 3.  Face perception: an integrative review of the role of spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Marcos Ruiz-Soler; Francesc S Beltran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-02

4.  What makes faces special?

Authors:  Xiaomin Yue; Bosco S Tjan; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Recognition of faces and complex objects in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutet; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

6.  Modulating adaptation to emotional faces by spatial frequency filtering.

Authors:  Giulia Prete; Bruno Laeng; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-11-26

7.  Appearance evaluation of others' faces and bodies in anorexia nervosa and body dysmorphic disorder.

Authors:  Teena D Moody; Vivian W Shen; Nathan L Hutcheson; Jennifer R Henretty; Courtney L Sheen; Michael Strober; Jamie D Feusner
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 4.861

8.  The categories, frequencies, and stability of idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns to faces.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Face or building superiority in peripheral vision reversed by task requirements.

Authors:  Najate Jebara; Delphine Pins; Pascal Despretz; Muriel Boucart
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-09-08

10.  Natural facial motion enhances cortical responses to faces.

Authors:  Johannes Schultz; Karin S Pilz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.