Literature DB >> 1591971

Comparative effects of luminance and scatter on the pattern visual evoked potential and eye-hand reaction time.

M McKerral1, P Lachapelle, J Benoit.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of reduced luminance and increased scatter on the pattern visual evoked potential and eye-hand reaction time evoked to a check size of 0.5 degrees in 10 normal subjects. Data analysis indicated that a reduction in luminance as well as an increase in scatter caused a statistically significant increase in the peak time of the pattern visual evoked potential P100 wave. The reaction time, however, was not significantly affected by the initial 0.9-log unit attenuation of the stimulus luminance or the 0.3 scatter filter. Further attenuation of luminance or increase of scatter also yielded statistically significant increases. Our results suggest that the reaction time is less affected by a reduction in luminance or an increase in scatter of a 0.5 degrees stimulus than the pattern visual evoked potential is and therefore represents a more reliable test to assess visual function, especially in the presence of medial opacities, which are known to reduce luminance and produce scatter.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1591971     DOI: 10.1007/bf00156576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  10 in total

1.  SIGNAL LUMINANCE AND POSITION EFFECTS IN HUMAN REACTION TIME.

Authors:  J D RAINS
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1963 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The effect of blur and contrast on VEP latency: comparison between check and sinusoidal and grating patterns.

Authors:  P Bobak; I Bodis-Wollner; S Guillory
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-07

3.  Effect of decreased retinal illumination on simultaneously recorded pattern electroretinograms and visual-evoked potentials.

Authors:  J Froehlich; D I Kaufman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Saccadic latency as a measure of afferent visual conduction.

Authors:  M G Brigell; J A Goodwin; R Lorance
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Delayed pattern-evoked responses in optic neuritis in relation to visual acuity.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1973

6.  Invariance of the contrast evoked potential with changes in retinal illuminance.

Authors:  L H van der Tweel; O Estévez; C R Cavonius
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Effect of refractive error on the visual evoked response.

Authors:  D W Collins; W M Carroll; J L Black; M Walsh
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-01-27

8.  Effect of retinal blur on the peak latency of the pattern evoked potential.

Authors:  S Sokol; A Moskowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to stimulus intensity.

Authors:  H G Vaughan; L D Costa; L Gilden
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Effects of luminance on the pattern visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  B R Cant; A L Hume; N A Shaw
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-10
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Visual evoked potentials and reaction time measurements to motion-reversal luminance- and texture-defined stimuli.

Authors:  Hadi Chakor; Armando Bertone; Michelle McKerral; Jocelyn Faubert; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Mar-May       Impact factor: 2.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.