Literature DB >> 8173067

Adherence and psychological adjustment among women at high risk for breast cancer.

C Lerman1, M Schwartz.   

Abstract

Increasingly, women with a positive family history of breast cancer are being targeted for cancer prevention and control efforts. Two findings have been demonstrated consistently across studies of this high risk population. First, these women often have high levels of psychological distress, as well as persistent and intrusive worries about developing breast cancer. Second, despite their increased risk for developing breast cancer, a substantial proportion of these women do not adhere to recommended breast cancer screening guidelines. There is growing evidence that psychological distress is an important barrier to adherence among high risk women. Despite this, little is known about how to intervene to improve psychological adjustment and adherence in this population. In the present paper, we review the literature on adherence and psychological adjustment in women who are at increased risk for breast cancer because of a positive family history of disease. This review provides the basis for a discussion of potential intervention strategies designed to increase adherence and reduce psychological distress in this population. Finally, we present some of the psychological implications of recent developments in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8173067     DOI: 10.1007/bf00666427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  47 in total

1.  Effect of fear-arousing communications.

Authors:  I L JANIS; S FESHBACH
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1953-01

2.  The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  C Lerman; E Ross; A Boyce; P M Gorchov; R McLaughlin; B Rimer; P Engstrom
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery?

Authors:  P A Ganz; A C Schag; J J Lee; M L Polinsky; S J Tan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The risk factors of age and family history and their relationship to screening mammography utilization.

Authors:  M E Costanza; A Stoddard; V P Gaw; J G Zapka
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: results from 214 families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D F Easton; D T Bishop; D Ford; G P Crockford
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  B B Biesecker; M Boehnke; K Calzone; D S Markel; J E Garber; F S Collins; B L Weber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Telephone counseling improves adherence to colposcopy among lower-income minority women.

Authors:  C Lerman; P Hanjani; C Caputo; S Miller; E Delmoor; S Nolte; P Engstrom
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  K M Kash; J C Holland; M S Halper; D G Miller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Potential role of tamoxifen in prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  S G Nayfield; J E Karp; L G Ford; F A Dorr; B S Kramer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-10-16       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Using a state cancer registry to increase screening behaviors of sisters and daughters of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  P S Houts; S L Wojtkowiak; M A Simmonds; G B Weinberg; D F Heitjan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  64 in total

1.  Heightened psychobiological reactivity to laboratory stressors in healthy women at familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Sandra G Zakowski; William Gerin; Jean Mamakos; Thomas Pickering; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2002-02

2.  Prospective association between distress and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Kathryn L Taylor; Kristen S Willard
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-04

3.  Media messages about cancer: what do people understand?

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Josephine Calvi; Rebecca Cowan; Mary E Costanza; Paul K J Han; Sarah M Greene; Laura Saccoccio; Erica Cove; Douglas Roblin; Andrew Williams
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010

4.  A qualitative study of lung cancer risk perceptions and smoking beliefs among national lung screening trial participants.

Authors:  Elyse R Park; Joanna M Streck; Ilana F Gareen; Jamie S Ostroff; Kelly A Hyland; Nancy A Rigotti; Hannah Pajolek; Mark Nichter
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Family environments of women seeking BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic mutation testing: an exploratory analysis.

Authors:  Lisa A Keenan; Karen T Lesniak; Charles A Guarnaccia; Becky Althaus; Gaby Ethington; Joanne L Blum
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  To test or not to test? Moderators of the relationship between risk perceptions and interest in predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Shiri Ilan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-09-30

7.  Screening behavior in women at increased familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Yoland C Antill; John Reynolds; Mary Anne Young; Judy A Kirk; Katherine M Tucker; Tarli L Bogtstra; Shirley S Wong; Tracy E Dudding; Juliana L Di Iulio; Kelly-Anne Phillips
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Identification of cognitive profiles among women considering BRCA1/2 testing through the utilisation of cluster analytic techniques.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Kerry A Sherman; Suzanne M Miller; Karen Hurley; Mary B Daly; Andrew Godwin; Joanne S Buzaglo; Kuang-Yi Wen
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-07-14

9.  Risk perception and self-management in urban, diverse adults with type 2 diabetes: the improving diabetes outcomes study.

Authors:  Erica Shreck; Jeffrey S Gonzalez; Hillel W Cohen; Elizabeth A Walker
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02

10.  Breast self-examination in long-term breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Peter C Trask; Lynne Pahl; Melinda Begeman
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.