Literature DB >> 12776381

Prospective association between distress and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer.

Marc D Schwartz1, Kathryn L Taylor, Kristen S Willard.   

Abstract

In this study we sought to evaluate the prospective association between psychological distress and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer. We evaluated the association of cancer worry, cancer-specific distress, and general distress with mammography utilization after controlling for potential confounders. The results revealed that 74% of our sample had obtained a mammogram within 12 months of the baseline assessment. Logistic regression models revealed that after controlling for potential confounding variables, cancer worry and general distress were independent predictors of mammography utilization. Specifically, women who reported higher levels of worry and/or distress at baseline were less likely to report having received a mammogram in the 12 months following the baseline assessment. These results are in contrast to the only other prospective study in this population. Additional research is needed to determine the prospective association between distress and adherence and to identify potential mechanisms for such an association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12776381     DOI: 10.1023/a:1023078521319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  25 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale amongst women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  B Thewes; B Meiser; I B Hickie
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior.

Authors:  C Lerman; K Kash; M Stefanek
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1994

3.  A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire.

Authors:  David Cella; Chanita Hughes; Amy Peterman; Chih-Hung Chang; Beth N Peshkin; Marc D Schwartz; Lari Wenzel; Amy Lemke; Alfred C Marcus; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Distress, personality, and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  M D Schwartz; K L Taylor; K S Willard; J E Siegel; R M Lamdan; K Moran
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Distress and psychiatric morbidity among women from high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families.

Authors:  J C Coyne; N R Benazon; C G Gaba; K Calzone; B L Weber
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2000-10

6.  Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Biesecker; J L Benkendorf; J Kerner; A Gomez-Caminero; C Hughes; M M Reed
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Promoting cancer screening among the first-degree relatives of breast and colorectal cancer patients: the design of two randomized trials.

Authors:  A C Marcus; D Ahnen; G Cutter; N Calonge; S Russell; S M Sedlacek; M Wood; D Manchester; L Fox; W McCaskill-Stevens; D Fairclough; S Hines; L Wenzel; K Osborn
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Anxiety and compliance among women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  N M Lindberg; D Wellisch
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2001

9.  Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  K M Kash; J C Holland; M S Halper; D G Miller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: interacting effects of counseling, educational level, and coping style.

Authors:  C Lerman; M D Schwartz; S M Miller; M Daly; C Sands; B K Rimer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  13 in total

1.  Inconsistent mammography perceptions and practices among women at risk of breast cancer following a pediatric malignancy: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Stephanie M Smith; Jennifer S Ford; William Rakowski; Chaya S Moskowitz; Lisa Diller; Melissa M Hudson; Ann C Mertens; Annette L Stanton; Tara O Henderson; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Affective associations and cognitive beliefs relate to individuals' decisions to perform testicular or breast self-exams.

Authors:  Carolyn R Brown-Kramer; Marc T Kiviniemi
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-04-08

4.  Health care access and breast cancer screening among Latinas along the California-Mexican border.

Authors:  Sheila F Castañeda; Vanessa L Malcarne; Pennie G Foster-Fishman; William S Davidson; Manpreet K Mumman; Natasha Riley; Georgia R Sadler
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-08

5.  Prospective study of factors predicting adherence to surveillance mammography in women treated for breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Shelby; Cindy D Scipio; Tamara J Somers; Mary Scott Soo; Kevin P Weinfurt; Francis J Keefe
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The influence of culture and cancer worry on colon cancer screening among older Chinese-American women.

Authors:  Judy Huei-Yu Wang; Wenchi Liang; Mei-Yuh Chen; Jennifer Cullen; Shibao Feng; Bin Yi; Marc D Schwartz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.847

7.  Factors associated with breast cancer prevention communication between mothers and daughters.

Authors:  Pamela S Sinicrope; Tabetha A Brockman; Christi A Patten; Marlene H Frost; Robert A Vierkant; Larra R Petersen; Emily Rock; Lara P Clark; Celine M Vachon; Zachary S Fredericksen; Thomas A Sellers; James R Cerhan
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Breast Cancer Perception Scale: Psychometric Development Study.

Authors:  Seçil Taylan; İlknur Özkan; Derya Adıbelli
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2021-03-31

9.  Generation after generation: exploring the psychological impact of providing genetic services through a cascading approach.

Authors:  Donald W Hadley; Sato Ashida; Jean F Jenkins; Jean C Martin; Kathleen A Calzone; Natalia R Kuhn; Colleen M McBride; Ilan R Kirsch; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Worry is good for breast cancer screening: a study of female relatives from the ontario site of the breast cancer family registry.

Authors:  Li Rita Zhang; Anna M Chiarelli; Gord Glendon; Lucia Mirea; Julia A Knight; Irene L Andrulis; Paul Ritvo
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.