Literature DB >> 15604630

Family environments of women seeking BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic mutation testing: an exploratory analysis.

Lisa A Keenan1, Karen T Lesniak, Charles A Guarnaccia, Becky Althaus, Gaby Ethington, Joanne L Blum.   

Abstract

Although there is some understanding of the shared characteristics and predictors of psychological distress of women participating in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer registries, these same characteristics are only beginning to be identified in research on community women seeking genetic testing for BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations. This study provides an initial exploration of characteristics associated with family environments for 51 community women waiting to receive such genetic testing results. Thirty-four of the 36 women classified on family environment type of the Family Environment Scale (FES) were from Personal Growth-Oriented families. Comparisons of women with and without personal cancer histories resulted in a trend for women with personal cancer histories to be classified as from Independence-Oriented families. Reported distress appears to vary for different family emphases based on family and personal cancer history. A moral-religious family emphasis consistently appeared to be associated with decreased psychological distress. Preliminary analyses comparing these community women (who were not part of a hereditary registry but were self- or physician-referred) seeking genetic testing with normal and distressed family means found that increased cohesion and expressiveness may be related to decreased conflict, indicative of potentially supportive family environments for these women. When compared with normative data, a subset consisting of the Ashkenazi Jewish women showed a trend of less cohesion than normal families, but similar cohesion levels as distressed families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15604630     DOI: 10.1023/B:JOGC.0000018824.04992.7b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  19 in total

1.  Traumatic stress, life events, and emotional support in women with metastatic breast cancer: cancer-related traumatic stress symptoms associated with past and current stressors.

Authors:  L D Butler; C Koopman; C Classen; D Spiegel
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  The influence of psychological distress on use of genetic testing for cancer risk.

Authors:  C Lerman; M D Schwartz; T H Lin; C Hughes; S Narod; H T Lynch
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1997-06

3.  Circumplex model of marital and family system: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications.

Authors:  D H Olson; D H Sprenkle; C S Russell
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  1979-03

4.  Participation in breast cancer susceptibility testing protocols: influence of recruitment source, altruism, and family involvement on women's decisions.

Authors:  G Geller; T Doksum; B A Bernhardt; S A Metz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Toward a multi-method approach to assessing the effects of social support.

Authors:  I N Sandler; M Barrera
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  1984-02

6.  A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1.

Authors:  Y Miki; J Swensen; D Shattuck-Eidens; P A Futreal; K Harshman; S Tavtigian; Q Liu; C Cochran; L M Bennett; W Ding
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Women with breast cancer: perception of family functioning and adjustment to illness.

Authors:  L C Friedman; P E Baer; D V Nelson; M Lane; F E Smith; R J Dworkin
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 8.  Psychosocial and ethical implications of defining genetic risk for cancers.

Authors:  K M Kash
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1995-09-30       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  K M Kash; J C Holland; M S Halper; D G Miller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Potential role of tamoxifen in prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  S G Nayfield; J E Karp; L G Ford; F A Dorr; B S Kramer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-10-16       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.