Literature DB >> 8161978

Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures.

R D Hays1, R Anderson, D Revicki.   

Abstract

How does one determine if a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQL) is adequate for clinical trials? Psychometric methods are frequently used to answer this question. What is psychometrics all about? In this paper we address these questions, discussing common psychometric evaluation procedures applied to HRQL measures. Specifically, we discuss issues regarding the evaluation of reliability and validity (including responsiveness).

Mesh：

Year:  1993        PMID： 8161978     DOI： 10.1007/bf00422218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN： 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  39 in total

1.  Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation.

Authors:  R A Deyo; P Diehr; D L Patrick
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1991-08

Review 2.  A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A S Detsky; I G Naglie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research.

Authors:  David A Cole
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1987-08

4.  Measuring functioning and health in the very old.

Authors:  A L Siu; R D Hays; J G Ouslander; D Osterwell; R B Valdez; M Krynski; A Gross
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1993-01

5.  Change in self-reported functioning in older persons entering a residential care facility.

Authors:  A L Siu; J G Ouslander; D Osterweil; D B Reuben; R D Hays
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research.

Authors:  M H Liang; M G Larson; K E Cullen; J A Schwartz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1985-05

7.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Influence of age on measurement of health status in patients undergoing elective surgery.

Authors:  C M Mangione; E R Marcantonio; L Goldman; E F Cook; M C Donaldson; D J Sugarbaker; R Poss; T H Lee
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  A Perceived Health Index for use in persons with advanced HIV disease: derivation, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  S A Bozzette; R D Hays; S H Berry; D E Kanouse
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Multidimensionality of health status in an elderly population. Construct validity of a measurement battery.

Authors:  J A Hall; A M Epstein; B J McNeil
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983
View more
  131 in total

1.  Responsiveness of the EuroQol in breast cancer patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy.

Authors:  B Conner-Spady; C Cumming; J M Nabholtz; P Jacobs; D Stewart
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  A method to select an instrument for measurement of HR-QOL for cross-cultural adaptation applied to dermatology.

Authors:  A G de Tiedra; J Mercadal; X Badía; J M Mascaró; R Lozano
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The Spanish version of the Child Health and Illness Profile-Adolescent Edition (CHIP-AE).

Authors:  L Rajmil; V Serra-Sutton; J Alonso; B Starfield; A W Riley; J R Vázquez
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Evaluation of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Taiwan version in assessing elderly patients with hip fracture.

Authors:  Yea-Ing Lotus Shyu; Jui-fen Rachel Lu; Jersey Liang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Construct validity of the RAND-12 and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and 3 in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Sheri L Maddigan; David H Feeny; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  The stability of utility scores: test-retest reliability and the interpretation of utility scores in elective total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D Feeny; C M Blanchard; J L Mahon; R Bourne; C Rorabeck; L Stitt; S Webster-Bogaert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  A review of the progress towards developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for international clinical studies and outcomes research.

Authors:  R T Anderson; N K Aaronson; M Bullinger; W L McBee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Measuring the effect of cancer on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  D Osoba
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Development and psychometric tests of the Chinese-version Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Authors:  H Zou; X Zhang; X Xu; L Bai; J S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Measuring quality of life in children referred for psychiatric problems: psychometric properties of the PedsQL 4.0 generic core scales.

Authors:  D Bastiaansen; H M Koot; I L Bongers; J W Varni; F C Verhulst
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.