Literature DB >> 10163577

A review of the progress towards developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for international clinical studies and outcomes research.

R T Anderson1, N K Aaronson, M Bullinger, W L McBee.   

Abstract

This article reviews the international adaptation and use of generic health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) measures over the last several years. It focuses, as examples, on the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Item Health Survey (MOS SF-36), the EuroQoL, Dartmouth Primary Care Cooperative Information Project (COOP) chart system, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) and the World Health Organization's WHOQOL. These instruments exemplify several different models for developing or adapting HRQL measures described in the literature, each model choosing unique approaches to the process of validation for cross-national use. There has been considerable scientific activity in recent years aimed at advancing the capabilities for international HRQL assessments. Whereas prior adaptation work was focused exclusively on translation issues, recent work has begun to rely on common methodology for translation and validation of key measurement properties across language versions. Although the major HRQL measures reviewed have not yet reached the point at which there is sufficient evidence for measurement equivalence across different language versions, internationally coordinated projects are planned and under way for these instruments to advance and refine this capacity. Preliminary evidence suggests that there are few prominent differences between countries in ranking of health states that are representative of major HRQL dimensions, and in the levels of impact of illnesses on well-being within those dimensions. Future studies should collect additional psychometric data to more fully quantify measurement equivalence among the various language versions in which each instrument is available. Additionally, more work is required to address cultural differences within nations or language groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10163577     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199610040-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  69 in total

1.  Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement.

Authors:  M E Kantz; W J Harris; K Levitsky; J E Ware; A R Davies
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Education of adult patients at an "asthma school": effects on quality of life, knowledge and need for nursing.

Authors:  K C Ringsberg; I Wiklund; L Wilhelmsen
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  Measurement of general health status of non-oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.

Authors:  J Alonso; J M Antó; M González; J A Fiz; J Izquierdo; J Morera
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  A comparison of two survey measures of health status.

Authors:  R Leavey; D Wilkin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  The Nottingham health profile: a useful tool for epidemiologists?

Authors:  P Kind; R Carr-Hill
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.

Authors:  A L Stewart; R D Hays; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures.

Authors:  R D Hays; R Anderson; D Revicki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Health status of survivors of cardiac arrest and of myocardial infarction controls.

Authors:  L Bergner; A P Hallstrom; M Bergner; M S Eisenberg; L A Cobb
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Summary of the WONCA/COOP International Health Assessment Field Trial. The Dartmouth COOP Primary Care Network.

Authors:  J M Landgraf; E C Nelson
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  1992-03

10.  Relative costs and cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal and ureteric stones.

Authors:  N Mays
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Rao; D L Keininger; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Health-related quality of life and healthcare utilisation in patients with Parkinson's disease: impact of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias.

Authors:  R C Dodel; K Berger; W H Oertel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  A method to select an instrument for measurement of HR-QOL for cross-cultural adaptation applied to dermatology.

Authors:  A G de Tiedra; J Mercadal; X Badía; J M Mascaró; R Lozano
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Health-related quality of life in older adult survivors of selected cancers: data from the SEER-MHOS linkage.

Authors:  Erin E Kent; Anita Ambs; Sandra A Mitchell; Steven B Clauser; Ashley Wilder Smith; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Pharmaceutical care programmes for the elderly: economic issues.

Authors:  Grainne E Crealey; Ian K Sturgess; James C McElnay; Carmel M Hughes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments.

Authors:  Michael D Rawlins; Anthony J Culyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-24

7.  Improved health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting is unrelated to use of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Otso Järvinen; Timo Saarinen; Juhani Julkunen; Jari Laurikka; Heini Huhtala; Matti R Tarkka
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Issues in conducting cross-cultural research: implementation of an agreed international protocol [corrected] designed by the WHOQOL Group for the conduct of focus groups eliciting the quality of life of older adults.

Authors:  Graeme Hawthorne; Natasha Davidson; Kathryn Quinn; Farah McCrate; Ines Winkler; Ramona Lucas; Reinhold Kilian; Anita Molzahn
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Impact of cultural and linguistic factors on symptom reporting by patients with cancer.

Authors:  Xin Shelley Wang; Charles S Cleeland; Tito R Mendoza; Young Ho Yun; Ying Wang; Toru Okuyama; Valen E Johnson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Reliability and validity of the child health questionnaire-child form (CHQ-CF87) in a Dutch adolescent population.

Authors:  H Raat; J M Landgraf; G J Bonsel; R J B J Gemke; M L Essink-Bot
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.