Literature DB >> 10155320

Measuring the effect of cancer on health-related quality of life.

D Osoba1.   

Abstract

Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with cancer has focused primarily on the development of reliable and valid instruments (questionnaires), and on the effect of chemotherapy in phase III clinical trials. From this research several important lessons have emerged, such as: (i) the need to measure multiple domains; (ii) the importance of self-rating; (iii) the reports of counter-intuitive results; (iv) the ability to quantify the effects of symptoms on health-related quality of life; and (v) the prognostic value of health-related quality of life measurement for survival. Many challenges lie ahead. Among these are the difficulties encountered by medical clinicians in choosing appropriate instruments to measure health-related quality of life, the dilemma of choosing between aggregate scores and domain scores, questions surrounding the significance of results, and whether measurement of health-related quality of life is now at a point where it can be used in routine practice outside of the clinical trials setting. Although further research is required in all of these and other areas, the future for health-related quality-of-life measurement in oncology is promising.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10155320     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199507040-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  64 in total

Review 1.  Measuring quality of life in clinical trials: a taxonomy and review.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; S J Veldhuyzen Van Zanten; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

3.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

Review 4.  Interpretation of quality of life changes.

Authors:  E Lydick; R S Epstein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  D A Revicki; R M Kaplan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures.

Authors:  R D Hays; R Anderson; D Revicki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Prognostic value of quality of life scores in a trial of chemotherapy with or without interferon in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma.

Authors:  A Coates; D Thomson; G R McLeod; P Hersey; P G Gill; I N Olver; R Kefford; R M Lowenthal; G Beadle; E Walpole
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Quality of life assessment of patients in extremity sarcoma clinical trials.

Authors:  P H Sugarbaker; I Barofsky; S A Rosenberg; F J Gianola
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 9.  Quality-of-life-adjusted survival for comparing cancer treatments. A commentary on TWiST and Q-TWiST.

Authors:  M L Feldstein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients.

Authors:  P J Selby; J A Chapman; J Etazadi-Amoli; D Dalley; N F Boyd
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  A method to select an instrument for measurement of HR-QOL for cross-cultural adaptation applied to dermatology.

Authors:  A G de Tiedra; J Mercadal; X Badía; J M Mascaró; R Lozano
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The use of quality of life data in clinical practice.

Authors:  J Morris; D Perez; B McNoe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-c30): validation of English version in Singapore.

Authors:  N Luo; C S L Fones; S E Lim; F Xie; J Thumboo; S C Li
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.