Literature DB >> 15085916

Construct validity of the RAND-12 and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and 3 in type 2 diabetes.

Sheri L Maddigan1, David H Feeny, Jeffrey A Johnson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cross-sectional construct validity of the RAND-12 and the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI2) and Mark 3 (HUI3) in type 2 diabetes.
METHODS: Parametric tests were used to test for differences in HRQL scores between known groups with type 2 diabetes, defined in terms of treatment intensity, duration of diabetes and glycemic control.
RESULTS: The PHC of the RAND-12 was significantly lower for individuals treated with insulin (40.28 +/- 10.97) than diet alone (45.18 +/- 12.02, p < 0.01), as was the MHC (42.83 +/- 10.75 vs. 46.87 +/- 10.89, p < 0.05). MHC (43.56 +/- 10.20 vs. 46.18 +/- 9.94, p < 0.05) and PHC (41.04 +/- 10.64 vs. 45.62 +/- 10.48, p < 0.001) were both lower for those with longer duration of diabetes. Overall HUI3 scores were lower in individuals above the median duration of diabetes (5.0 years) as compared to those with a shorter duration (0.60 +/- 0.29 vs. 0.67 +/- 0.29, p < 0.01) and for individuals whose diabetes was managed using insulin compared to diet alone (0.59 +/- 0.30 vs. 0.69 +/- 0.30, p < 0.05). Disease severity was associated with impairment on the ambulation, dexterity and pain attributes of the HUI3. Similar results were found for the HUI2. Overall HUI2 scores were highest for individuals managed with diet alone compared to those managed with insulin. Disease severity was associated with the mobility and self-care attributes of the HUI2. No relationship was found between any of the measures of HRQL and glycemic control.
CONCLUSIONS: Scores for individuals presumed to have more severe or advanced disease were significantly lower for many comparisons using the RAND-12, HUI2 and HUI3. The results of this study contribute evidence of construct validity of the HUI2, HUI3 and RAND-12 in type 2 diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15085916     DOI: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018497.06539.8f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  29 in total

1.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures.

Authors:  R D Hays; R Anderson; D Revicki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients is affected by complications but not by intensive policies to improve blood glucose or blood pressure control (UKPDS 37). U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 4.  Quality of life and diabetes.

Authors:  R R Rubin; M Peyrot
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.876

5.  Prevalence of diabetes and effect on quality of life in older French living in the community: the PAQUID Epidemiological Survey.

Authors:  I Bourdel-Marchasson; B Dubroca; G Manciet; A Decamps; J P Emeriau; J F Dartigues
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  The social consequences of insulin-treated diabetes mellitus in patients 20-50 years of age. An epidemiological case-control study.

Authors:  C Gåfvels; B Börjesson; F Lithner
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1991-06

7.  Health economic benefits and quality of life during improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.

Authors:  M A Testa; D C Simonson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Health-related quality of life measurement in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  F A Luscombe
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.725

10.  Health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes (TARDIS-2).

Authors:  J Holmes; S McGill; P Kind; J Bottomley; S Gillam; M Murphy
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.725

View more
  26 in total

1.  Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) demonstrated construct validity in a Nigerian population with hypertension.

Authors:  Obinna Ikechukwu Ekwunife; Cletus Nze Aguwa; Nneka Uchenna Igboeli
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Understanding the complex associations between patient-provider relationships, self-care behaviours, and health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes: a structural equation modeling approach.

Authors:  Sheri L Maddigan; Sumit R Majumdar; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Correlates of health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  D J Wexler; R W Grant; E Wittenberg; J L Bosch; E Cagliero; L Delahanty; M A Blais; J B Meigs
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Health-related quality of life deficits associated with diabetes and comorbidities in a Canadian National Population Health Survey.

Authors:  Sheri L Maddigan; David H Feeny; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Understanding the determinants of health for people with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Sheri L Maddigan; David H Feeny; Sumit R Majumdar; Karen B Farris; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Validation of Neuro-QoL and PROMIS Mental Health Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Persons with Huntington Disease.

Authors:  Noelle E Carlozzi; Siera Goodnight; Anna L Kratz; Julie C Stout; Michael K McCormack; Jane S Paulsen; Nicholas R Boileau; David Cella; Rebecca E Ready
Journal:  J Huntingtons Dis       Date:  2019

Review 7.  A meta-analysis of health state valuations for people with diabetes: explaining the variation across methods and implications for economic evaluation.

Authors:  Tom W C Lung; Alison J Hayes; Andrew Hayen; Andrew Farmer; Philip M Clarke
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Construct validity of the SF-12 among American Indian and Alaska Native people using two known scoring methods.

Authors:  Sandra L Edwards; Molly McFadden; Anne P Lanier; Maureen A Murtaugh; Elizabeth D Ferucci; Diana G Redwood; Lillian Tom-Orme; Martha L Slattery
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-08

9.  The construct validity of the health utilities index mark 3 in assessing health status in lung transplantation.

Authors:  Maria-Jose Santana; David Feeny; Sunita Ghosh; Ronald G Nador; Justin Weinkauf; Kathleen Jackson; Marianne Schafenacker; Dalyce Zuk; Grace Hubert; Dale Lien
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Sex differences in the relative contribution of social and clinical factors to the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 measure of health-related quality of life in older home care clients.

Authors:  Colleen J Maxwell; Jian Kang; Jennifer D Walker; Jenny X Zhang; David B Hogan; David H Feeny; Walter P Wodchis
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.