Literature DB >> 814191

Relative reinforcer magnitude under a nonindependent concurrent schedule of cocaine reinforcement in rhesus monkeys.

M E Llewellyn, C Iglauer, J H Woods.   

Abstract

Lever pressing by three rhesus monkeys was maintained under a two-lever concurrent schedule of cocaine reinforcement. Responding on one lever (constant-dose lever) produced a constant dose of 0.05 or 0.1 mg/kg/injection arranged according to a variable-interval 1-min schedule. Responding on the other lever (variable-dose lever) produced a comparison dose of cocaine (0.013 to 0.8 mg/kg/injection), also under a variable-interval 1-min schedule. The two variable-interval schedules were made nonindependent by arranging that the assignment of a reinforcer by one schedule inactivated the second schedule until the assigned reinforcer had been obtained. This modification ensured that the two cocaine doses were obtained with approximately equal frequency, regardless of the distribution of the subject's responding. Preference, indicated by relative response frequency on the variable-dose lever, was almost always for the larger of the doses and was a monotonic function of the comparison dose, except at the highest doses. Preferences at the highest comparison doses may have resulted from the low overall response rates exhibited at these doses. Relative response frequencies on the variable-dose lever roughly matched relative reinforcer magnitude (mg/kg/injection available on the variable-dose lever divided by the sum of mg/kg/injections available on each lever).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 814191      PMCID: PMC1333418          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  19 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Interaction of frequency and magnitude of reinforcement on concurrent performances.

Authors:  J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances.

Authors:  J W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer.

Authors:  E Fantino; N Squires; N Delbrück; C Peterson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Relative delay of reinforcement and choice.

Authors:  S R Hursh; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice between concurrent schedules.

Authors:  R L Menlove; M Moffitt; C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  C E Johanson; C R Schuster
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Codeine- and cocaine-reinforced responding in rhesus monkeys: effects of dose on response rates under a fixed-ratio schedule.

Authors:  D A Downs; J H Woods
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement by different doses of intravenous cocaine in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  C Iglauer; J H Woods
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Fixed-interval schedules of intravenous cocaine presentation in rats.

Authors:  J Dougherty; R Pickens
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  18 in total

1.  Progressive ratio and fixed ratio schedules of cocaine-maintained responding in baboons.

Authors:  R R Griffiths; L D Bradford; J V Brady
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Quantification of drug choice with the generalized matching law in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; James H Woods
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Humans' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount: Effects of the method of reinforcer delivery.

Authors:  G R King; A W Logue
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Matching under nonindependent variable-ratio schedules of drug reinforcement.

Authors:  R A Meisch; R Spiga
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Brain-cocaine concentrations determine the dose self-administered by rats on a novel behaviorally dependent dosing schedule.

Authors:  Benjamin A Zimmer; Carson V Dobrin; David C S Roberts
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Oral self-administration of pentobarbital by rhesus monkeys: relative reinforcing effects under concurrent fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  R A Meisch; G A Lemaire
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Progressive-ratio performance maintained by drug infusions: comparison of cocaine, diethylpropion, chlorphentermine, and fenfluramine.

Authors:  R R Griffiths; J V Brady; J D Snell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-01-31       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Preclinical assessment of abuse liability of drugs.

Authors:  J L Katz; S R Goldberg
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1988-02

Review 9.  Animal models of drug craving.

Authors:  A Markou; F Weiss; L H Gold; S B Caine; G Schulteis; G F Koob
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Concurrent access to two concentrations of orally delivered phencyclidine: effects of feeding conditions.

Authors:  M E Carroll
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.