Literature DB >> 1142112

A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey.

C E Johanson, C R Schuster.   

Abstract

A choice procedure was developed to compare the reinforcing efficacy of drug solutions delivered via intravenous catheters to rhesus monkeys. Choices were arranged between doses of cocaine or methylphenidate and saline, different doses of the same drug and doses of both drugs. In each session, monkeys were allowed to self-inject one solution five times in the presence of a stimulus. Thirty minutes after the fifth injection, a second solution could be self-injected five times in the presence of a different stimulus. Thirty minutes later, choice trials began in which both stimuli were present and monkeys could choose one of the two solutions. Rate of responding decreased with increases in dose for both cocaine (0.05-1.5 mg/kg) and methylphenidate (0.075-0.7 mg/kg). Response rates maintained by cocaine were 2 to 3 times higher than those maintained by methylphenidate. Drug was always chosen over saline. Higher doses of cocaine were preferred to lower doses except when both were above 0.5 mg/kg, when no preference was shown. Higher doses of methylphenidate were preferred over low doses, but compared to cocaine, a greater absolute difference between dose magnitude was required to demonstrate preference. When equal doses of cocaine and methylphenidate were compared, no preference was shown. On other comparisons between the drugs, the higher dose was generally preferred regardless of the drug. The reinforcing efficacy of drugs must be considered not only in terms of response rate maintained or reinforcement schedule but also with reference to concurrently available drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1142112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  74 in total

1.  Similar consumption and responding across single and multiple sources of drug.

Authors:  W K Bickel; G J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Three predictions of the economic concept of unit price in a choice context.

Authors:  G J Madden; W K Bickel; E A Jacobs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative reinforcing effects of different oral ethanol doses in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Robert B Stewart; Nian-Sheng Wang; April A Bass; Richard A Meisch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Progressive ratio and fixed ratio schedules of cocaine-maintained responding in baboons.

Authors:  R R Griffiths; L D Bradford; J V Brady
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Relation between choice of ethanol concentration and response rates under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: studies with rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Thomas H Gomez; Richard A Meisch
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Human behavioral pharmacology, past, present, and future: symposium presented at the 50th annual meeting of the Behavioral Pharmacology Society.

Authors:  Sandra D Comer; Warren K Bickel; Richard Yi; Harriet de Wit; Stephen T Higgins; Galen R Wenger; Chris-Ellyn Johanson; Mary Jeanne Kreek
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.293

7.  Self-administration of cocaine and remifentanil by monkeys: choice between single drugs and mixtures.

Authors:  Kevin B Freeman; William L Woolverton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Suppression of cocaine self-administration in monkeys: effects of delayed punishment.

Authors:  William L Woolverton; Kevin B Freeman; Joel Myerson; Leonard Green
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Different functional domains measured by cocaine self-administration under the progressive-ratio and punishment schedules in male Wistar rats.

Authors:  Udita Datta; Mariangela Martini; WenLin Sun
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Animal models of drug craving.

Authors:  A Markou; F Weiss; L H Gold; S B Caine; G Schulteis; G F Koob
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.