Literature DB >> 18422019

Quantification of drug choice with the generalized matching law in rhesus monkeys.

Mikhail N Koffarnus1, James H Woods.   

Abstract

The generalized matching law provides precise descriptions of choice, but has not been used to characterize choice between different doses of drugs or different classes of drugs. The current study examined rhesus monkeys' drug self-administration choices between identical drug doses, different doses, different drugs (cocaine, remifentanil, and methohexital), and between drug and drug-paired stimuli. The bias parameter of the generalized matching law was used to quantify preference for one reinforcer over another. Choice between identical drug doses yielded undermatching. Choices between 0.3 microg/kg/injection remifentanil and either 0.1 microg/kg/injection remifentanil or saline plus drug-paired stimuli revealed bias for the 0.3 microg/kg/injection dose. Choice was relatively insensitive to differences in random interval schedule value when one reinforcer was replaced with drug-paired stimulus presentations. Bias for 0.3 microg/kg/injection remifentanil over 10 microg/kg/injection cocaine was seen in one subject, and indifference was generally observed between 0.1 microg/kg/injection remifentanil and 56 microg/kg/injection cocaine and between 30 microg/kg/injection cocaine and 320 microg/kg/injection methohexital. These findings suggest the bias parameter may be useful in quantitatively measuring level of preference, which would be an advantage over concurrent FR procedures that often result in exclusive choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18422019      PMCID: PMC2251324          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2008.89-209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  26 in total

1.  Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.

Authors:  A P McLean; N M Blampied
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Frequency versus magnitude of reinforcement: New data with a different procedure.

Authors:  J C Todorov; E S Hanna; M C Bittencourt De Sá
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Do conditional reinforcers count?

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Assessing unit-price related remifentanil choice in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Chad M Galuska; Gail Winger; Steven R Hursh; James H Woods
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Concurrent variable-interval drug self-administration and the generalized matching law: a drug-class comparison.

Authors:  K G Anderson; W L Woolverton
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.293

10.  Reinforcement by orally delivered methadone, cocaine, and methadone-cocaine combinations in rhesus monkeys: are the combinations better reinforcers?

Authors:  N S Wang; V L Brown; J Grabowski; R A Meisch
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  7 in total

1.  Self-administration of cocaine and remifentanil by monkeys: choice between single drugs and mixtures.

Authors:  Kevin B Freeman; William L Woolverton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  The impact of cocaine and heroin drug history on motivation and cue sensitivity in a rat model of polydrug abuse.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Crummy; Elizabeth A Donckels; Britahny M Baskin; Brandon S Bentzley; Susan M Ferguson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Delay discounting of the μ-opioid receptor agonist remifentanil in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  David R Maguire; Lisa R Gerak; Charles P France
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.293

4.  Characterization of operant social interaction in rats: effects of access duration, effort, peer familiarity, housing conditions, and choice between social interaction vs. food or remifentanil.

Authors:  Jonathan J Chow; Nicholas J Beacher; Jules M Chabot; Marvellous Oke; Marco Venniro; Da-Ting Lin; Yavin Shaham
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Reinforcing effects of opioid/cannabinoid mixtures in rhesus monkeys responding under a food/drug choice procedure.

Authors:  David R Maguire; Charles P France
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Relative reinforcing effects of cocaine and 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) under a concurrent access self-administration procedure in rats.

Authors:  Robert W Seaman; Kenner C Rice; Gregory T Collins
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Preclinical Determinants of Drug Choice under Concurrent Schedules of Drug Self-Administration.

Authors:  Matthew L Banks; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2012-11-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.