Literature DB >> 16812607

Humans' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount: Effects of the method of reinforcer delivery.

G R King, A W Logue.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined human subjects' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount under different methods of reinforcer delivery. Subjects chose between schedules varying in terms of amount and/or delay of reinforcement, the reinforcer being points exchangeable for money. In Experiment 1, reinforcer amount was manipulated by varying the monetary value of the points across conditions while the number of seconds of access to a consummatory response remained constant. Choice was strongly sensitive to reinforcer amount and indicative of self-control, as in previous experiments. In Experiment 2, reinforcer amount was manipulated by automatically delivering different numbers of points during the amount period, and the consummatory response was eliminated. Sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount was significantly lower than in Experiment 1. Furthermore, the subjects in Experiment 2 exhibited significantly less self-control than did the subjects in Experiment 1. Humans' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount appears to be affected by factors that enhance the discrimi-nability of the consequences of responding.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 16812607      PMCID: PMC1323022          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Human vigilance: the rate of observing an instrument is controlled by the schedule of signal detections.

Authors:  J G HOLLAND
Journal:  Science       Date:  1958-07-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies.

Authors:  B A Matthews; E Shimoff; A C Catania; T Sagvolden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Impulse control in pigeons.

Authors:  G W Ainslie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Commitment, choice and self-control.

Authors:  H Rachlin; L Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experience-based differences.

Authors:  A W Logue; M L Rodriguez; T E Peña-Correal; B C Mauro
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Self-control in pigeons under the Mischel paradigm.

Authors:  J Grosch; A Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement by different doses of intravenous cocaine in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  C Iglauer; J H Woods
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Relative reinforcer magnitude under a nonindependent concurrent schedule of cocaine reinforcement in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  M E Llewellyn; C Iglauer; J H Woods
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Self-control in adult humans: variation in positive reinforcer amount and delay.

Authors:  A W Logue; T E Peña-Correal; M L Rodriguez; E Kabela
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Self-control and impulsiveness in children and adults: Effects of food preferences.

Authors:  L B Forzano; A W Logue
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Humans' choice in a self-control choice situation: sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcement density.

Authors:  M Ito; K Nakamura
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.