Literature DB >> 8130588

Improving the quality of patient care: the role of patient preferences in the clinical record.

G R Casper1, P F Brennan.   

Abstract

Patients are an important but overlooked participant in health information management. Patients serve as a source of self-monitoring data and for self-report of essential judgments such as preference for treatment and preferences for clinical outcomes. As the deliberations regarding the Computer-Based Patient Record initiative continue, decisions must be made about what patient-specific information will be entered in the record. In consideration of the mounting evidence that patient preferences represent an essential component in many health care decisions, it is timely to advocate for including patient preferences in the patient record. This represents one aspect of the patient role in health care information management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8130588      PMCID: PMC2248466     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care        ISSN: 0195-4210


  14 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life in patient decision making.

Authors:  Robert M Kaplan
Journal:  J Soc Issues       Date:  1991

2.  Involving consumers in quality of care assessment.

Authors:  A R Davies; J E Ware
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Shattuck lecture--outcomes management. A technology of patient experience.

Authors:  P M Ellwood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Pilot study of records of shared care for people with mental illnesses.

Authors:  B Essex; R Doig; J Renshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-02

5.  Deciding on breast cancer treatment: a description of decision behavior.

Authors:  P F Pierce
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Giving patients a copy of their computer medical record.

Authors:  M G Sheldon
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1982-02

7.  Medical records: practicalities and principles of patient possession.

Authors:  M L Gilhooly; S M McGhee
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 8.  The patient's story: integrating the patient- and physician-centered approaches to interviewing.

Authors:  R C Smith; R B Hoppe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Consensual norms regarding patient involvement.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Watchful waiting vs immediate transurethral resection for symptomatic prostatism. The importance of patients' preferences.

Authors:  M J Barry; A G Mulley; F J Fowler; J W Wennberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: the role of computer technology.

Authors:  P F Brennan; I Strombom
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Making patient values visible in healthcare: a systematic review of tools to assess patient treatment priorities and preferences in the context of multimorbidity.

Authors:  Dee Mangin; Gaibrie Stephen; Verdah Bismah; Cathy Risdon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.