Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Medical records: practicalities and principles of patient possession.

Literature DB >> 1941955

Medical records: practicalities and principles of patient possession.

M L Gilhooly¹, S M McGhee.
1. University of Glasgow.

Abstract

This review of issues and research is in two parts: 1) practical problems surrounding patient-held records and 2) ethical arguments for and against patient-held records. We argue that research on patient-held records indicates that there are no substantial practical drawbacks and considerable ethical benefits to be derived from giving patients custody of their medical records.

Entities: Species

Keywords: Access to Health Records Act 1990 (Great Britain); National Health Service; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh：

Year: 1991 PMID： 1941955 PMCID： PMC1376031 DOI： 10.1136/jme.17.3.138

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ethics ISSN： 0306-6800 Impact factor: 2.903

22 in total

Review 1. Literature review of legal aspects of medical records.

Authors: W C Kennedy; E Jacobs
Journal: Top Health Rec Manage Date: 1981-06

2. Transfer of medical records.

Authors: S Chantler
Journal: J R Coll Gen Pract Date: 1988-12

3. The non-litigant patient's right to medical records: medicine vs. law.

Authors: D G Hagman
Journal: J Forensic Sci Date: 1969-07 Impact factor: 1.832

4. A computer-assisted register and information system for diabetes.

Authors: R B Jones; A J Hedley; I Peacock; S P Allison; R B Tattersall
Journal: Methods Inf Med Date: 1983-01 Impact factor: 2.176

5. Encouraging behavior changes by use of client-held health records.

Authors: R Giglio; B Spears; D Rumpf; N Eddy
Journal: Med Care Date: 1978-09 Impact factor: 2.983

6. Do patients want access to their medical records?

Authors: M Michael; C Bordley
Journal: Med Care Date: 1982-04 Impact factor: 2.983

7. Confidentiality of medical records. An overview of concepts and legal policies.

Authors: W J Winslade
Journal: J Leg Med Date: 1982-12

8. Sounding Board. Patients who read their hospital charts.

Authors: J H Altman; P Reich; M J Kelly; M P Rogers
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1980-01-17 Impact factor: 91.245

9. Why patients should keep their own records.

Authors: V Coleman
Journal: J Med Ethics Date: 1984-03 Impact factor: 2.903

10. Giving patients a copy of their computer medical record.

Authors: M G Sheldon
Journal: J R Coll Gen Pract Date: 1982-02

16 in total

Review 1. Consumer health informatics.

Authors: G Eysenbach
Journal: BMJ Date: 2000-06-24

10. Pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate the use of patient held records for the continuing care of patients with cancer.

Authors: J G Williams; W Y Cheung; N Chetwynd; D R Cohen; S El-Sharkawi; I Finlay; B Lervy; M Longo; K Malinovszky
Journal: Qual Health Care Date: 2001-09

Medical records: practicalities and principles of patient possession.

Review 1. Literature review of legal aspects of medical records.

2. Transfer of medical records.

3. The non-litigant patient's right to medical records: medicine vs. law.

4. A computer-assisted register and information system for diabetes.

5. Encouraging behavior changes by use of client-held health records.

6. Do patients want access to their medical records?

7. Confidentiality of medical records. An overview of concepts and legal policies.

8. Sounding Board. Patients who read their hospital charts.

9. Why patients should keep their own records.

10. Giving patients a copy of their computer medical record.

Review 1. Consumer health informatics.

2. Repeat dispensing by community pharmacists: advantages for patients and practitioners.

3. Searching published reports.

4. Should patients be allowed to look after their own medical records?

5. The right to know.

Review 6. Integrated record keeping as an essential aspect of a primary care led health service.

7. Attitudes towards, and utility of, an integrated medical-dental patient-held record in primary care.

8. Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients.

9. Parent Perspectives on Pediatric Inpatient OpenNotes.

10. Pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate the use of patient held records for the continuing care of patients with cancer.