Literature DB >> 8424063

Deciding on breast cancer treatment: a description of decision behavior.

P F Pierce1.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to describe the unaided decision-making process of women facing treatment for early stage breast cancer and to provide the empirical grounding to develop a conceptual framework for more structured research. A convenience sample of 48 women completed an open-ended interview while they were making a decision. A qualitative analysis of these interviews identified five empirical indicators of decision behavior: (a) perceived salience of alternatives, (b) decision conflict, (c) information seeking, (d) risk awareness, and (e) deliberation. The configurations of these indicators discriminated the decision maker into one of three empirically derived groups. In order of complexity, these are termed Deferrer, Delayer, and Deliberator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8424063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  18 in total

1.  Is mastectomy overused? A call for an expanded research agenda.

Authors:  Paula V Lantz; Judith K Zemencuk; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Informed consent for clinical treatment.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Allan V Prochazka; Aaron S Fink
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Management of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; A Liberati; R Grilli; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-12

4.  Shared decision-making and evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Jared R Adams; Robert E Drake
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2006-02

5.  Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Kendra Schwartz; Lihua Liu; Indu Lakhani; Barbara Salem; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Evaluation of a patient information website for childhood cancer survivors.

Authors:  Sebastiaan L Knijnenburg; Leontien C Kremer; A Birgitta Versluys; Katja I Braam; Minke S Mud; Heleen J van der Pal; Huib N Caron; Monique W Jaspers
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Development of an informational web site for recruiting research participants: process, implementation, and evaluation.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Karen Kavanaugh; Rebekah Hamilton; Susan C Klock; Lisa Merry; Ellen Olshansky; Penny F Pierce
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Significant increase in breast conservation in 16 years of trials conducted by the Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  Raimund Jakesz; Hellmut Samonigg; Michael Gnant; Ernst Kubista; Dieter Depisch; Roland Kolb; Brigitte Mlineritsch; Hans-Jörg Mischinger; Rainer-Christian Menzel; Peter Steindorfer; Werner Kwasny; Christoph Tausch; Michael Stierer; Susanne Taucher; Michael Seifert; Hubert Hausmaninger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Personality predicts prostate cancer treatment decision-making difficulty and satisfaction.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Louis A Penner; Brady T West; Tracy M Downs; Walter Rayford; Willie Underwood
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.