Literature DB >> 8126394

Effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on the parameters of the response-strength equation.

N M Petry1, G M Heyman.   

Abstract

This experiment examined the relationship between two qualitatively different reinforcers and the parameters of a quantitative model of reinforced responding, referred to as the response-strength equation or the Herrnstein equation. A group of rats was first food deprived and later water deprived. An 11.5% sucrose solution served as the reinforcer in the food-deprivation condition, and water was the reinforcer in the water-deprivation condition. Each experimental session consisted of a series of seven variable-interval schedules, providing reinforcement rates that varied between 20 and 1,200 reinforcers per hour. The response rates increased in a negatively accelerating function in a manner consistent with the response-strength equation. This equation has two fitted parameters, k and Re. According to one theory, the k parameter is a measure of motor performance, and Re is indicative of the relative reinforcement efficacy of the background uncontrollable sources of reinforcement in relation to the experimentally arranged reinforcer. In this study, k did not change as a result of the different reinforcers, but Re was significantly larger in the sucrose-reinforcement condition. These results are consistent with the interpretation that k and Re measure two independent and experimentally distinguishable parameters and provide further evidence that absolute response rate is a function of relative reinforcement rate, as implied by the derivation of the response-strength equation based on the matching law.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8126394      PMCID: PMC1334356          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  Effects of methylphenidate on response rate and measures of motor performance and reinforcement efficacy.

Authors:  G M Heyman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics.

Authors:  G N WILKINSON
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  The effect of deprivation and frequency of reinforcement on variable-interval responding.

Authors:  F C Clark
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-08       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: the effect of the concentration of sucrose reinforcement.

Authors:  C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi; P Bevan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Conditioned Approach and Contact Behavior toward Signals for Food or Brain-Stimulation Reinforcement.

Authors:  G B Peterson; J E Ackilt; G P Frommer; E S Hearst
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-09-15       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; B R Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Reward, performance, and the response strength method in self-stimulating rats: validation and neuroleptics.

Authors:  A L Hamilton; J R Stellar; E B Hart
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1985-12

10.  Assessment of pimozide's motor and hedonic effects on operant behavior in rats.

Authors:  J H Porter; H F Villanueva
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  4 in total

1.  The sensitivity of response rate to the rate of variable-interval reinforcement for pigeons and rats: a review.

Authors:  Richard L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength.

Authors:  G M Heyman; M M Monaghan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Increasing and signaling background reinforcement: effect on the foreground response-reinforcer relation.

Authors:  T W Belke; G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Quantitative analysis of performance on a progressive-ratio schedule: effects of reinforcer type, food deprivation and acute treatment with Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).

Authors:  C M Olarte-Sánchez; L Valencia-Torres; H J Cassaday; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.777

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.