Literature DB >> 2869532

Reward, performance, and the response strength method in self-stimulating rats: validation and neuroleptics.

A L Hamilton, J R Stellar, E B Hart.   

Abstract

The response strength method consists of exposing the subject to a series of variable interval schedules of reinforcement at differing densities. Response rate is plotted against obtained reinforcement rate for each schedule. The data conform to a negatively accelerated curve that is fit well by an analytical representation which contains two parameters. The values of these parameters are obtained from the fitted curve, and are suggested to independently reflect reinforcement and performance functions. In a first experiment, two manipulations were conducted that validated these suggestions. First, lowering the frequency of brain stimulation pulses induced a relatively selective shift in the reinforcement parameter. Second, increasing the force required to press the lever primarily altered the performance parameter. In a second experiment, the effects of neuroleptic administration on these two parameters were noted and compared to the results of the first experiment. In general, neuroleptics were seen to produce both reward and motor/performance impairments in self-stimulating rats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2869532     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(85)90257-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  17 in total

1.  Effects of methylphenidate on response rate and measures of motor performance and reinforcement efficacy.

Authors:  G M Heyman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  A matching law analysis of the effects of dopamine receptor antagonists.

Authors:  P Willner; D Sampson; G Phillips; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effects of adding a second reinforcement alternative: implications for Herrnstein's interpretation of r(e).

Authors:  Paul L Soto; Jack J McDowell; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength.

Authors:  G M Heyman; M M Monaghan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Optimal indolence: a normative microscopic approach to work and leisure.

Authors:  Ritwik K Niyogi; Yannick-Andre Breton; Rebecca B Solomon; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal; Peter Dayan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Evidence for an involvement of 5-hydroxytryptaminergic neurones in the maintenance of operant behaviour by positive reinforcement.

Authors:  M A Wogar; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  DSP4 alters the effect of d-amphetamine on variable-interval performance: analysis in terms of Herrnstein's equation.

Authors:  M J Morley; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Chlorpromazine and pimozide alter reinforcement efficacy and motor performance.

Authors:  G M Heyman; D L Kinzie; L S Seiden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Time-, schedule-, and reinforcer-dependent effects of pimozide and amphetamine.

Authors:  G Phillips; P Willner; D Sampson; J Nunn; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  The time course of neuroleptic therapy for psychosis: role of learning processes and implications for concepts of psychotic illness.

Authors:  R Miller
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.