Literature DB >> 8084731

Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: an electrophysiological analysis.

H J Heinze1, S J Luck, T F Münte, A Gös, G R Mangun, S A Hillyard.   

Abstract

Some theories of visuospatial attention propose that attention can be divided between separated zones of space that exclude the intervening region, whereas other theories state that the focus of attention must encompass a unitary, continuous zone. These contrasting views were evaluated in an experiment in which subjects were required to monitor two of four stimulus locations for targets; the two relevant locations were adjacent in one condition and were separated by an intervening irrelevant location in a second condition. To assess the distribution of attention across the relevant and irrelevant locations, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded to task-irrelevant "probe" stimuli that were occasionally presented at the individual stimulus locations. When the relevant locations were adjacent, probes presented at irrelevant locations elicited smaller sensory-evoked electrophysiological responses than probes presented at relevant locations, consistent with an attentional suppression of inputs from the unattended locations. When the relevant locations were separated by an irrelevant location, however, the sensory responses evoked by probes presented at this intervening irrelevant location were not suppressed, and target detection performance became slower and less accurate. These results suggest that attention forms a unitary zone that may expand to encompass multiple relevant locations but must also include the area between them; as a result, irrelevant information arising from intervening locations is not suppressed and perceptual processing is compromised.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8084731     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  36 in total

1.  Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components.

Authors:  S J Luck; H J Heinze; G R Mangun; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-06

2.  The spatial allocation of visual attention as indexed by event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  G R Mangun; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues.

Authors:  T D Murphy; C W Eriksen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-12

4.  Enhanced detection in the aperture of focal attention during simple discrimination tasks.

Authors:  D Sagi; B Julesz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Jun 12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Natural boundaries for the spatial spread of directed visual attention.

Authors:  H C Hughes; L D Zimba
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Moving attention through visual space.

Authors:  G L Shulman; R W Remington; J P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The role of attention in feature detection and conjunction discrimination: an electrophysiological analysis.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.292

8.  Selective attention to color and location: an analysis with event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; T F Münte
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-08

9.  Sensitization of the visual field.

Authors:  R Egly; D Homa
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06
View more
  16 in total

1.  Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model.

Authors:  K R Cave; N P Bichot
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

2.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of processing nonsymbolic number: an event-related potential source localization study.

Authors:  Daniel C Hyde; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Searching for two feature singletons in the visual scene: the localized attentional interference effect.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Jianguo Lü; Hermann J Müller; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spatial distribution of visual attention: perceptual sensitivity and response latency.

Authors:  T C Handy; A Kingstone; G R Mangun
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-05

5.  Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential.

Authors:  S T Morgan; J C Hansen; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Temporal dynamics of divided spatial attention.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Javier O Garcia; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Modulation of early cortical processing during divided attention to non-contiguous locations.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Frey; Anita M Schmid; Jeremy W Murphy; Sophie Molholm; Edmund C Lalor; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets.

Authors:  J F Juola; H Koshino; C B Warner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-04

9.  Attentional enhancement during multiple-object tracking.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Andrew W McCollough; Todd S Horowitz; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

10.  The role of perceptual load in object recognition.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Zhicheng Lin; Nahid Zokaei; Volker Thoma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.