Literature DB >> 6239906

Sensitization of the visual field.

R Egly, D Homa.   

Abstract

Three experiments investigated the identification or localization of a letter that was displaced from the fixation point by 1 degree-3 degrees. The subject's task was to identify a fixated letter and identify (Experiment 1) or localize (Experiments 2 and 3) the displaced letter. On uncued trials, the displaced letter could appear at any of eight locations on any of three rings surrounding the fixated letter; on cued trials, the ring containing the displaced letter was specified. The results indicated that cuing improved subjects' identification and localization of the displaced letter. Invalid cuing (Experiment 3) produced costs comparable in magnitude to the benefits. The distance of the target from the cued ring determined cost, but costs were unaffected by the appearance of a target within the presumed beam of attention. It was proposed that attention should be viewed as a general, rather than feature-specific, resource that can be voluntarily allocated to multiple regions of the visual field.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6239906     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.6.778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  20 in total

1.  Attentional diversion during adaptation affects the velocity as well as the duration of motion after-effects.

Authors:  M S Georgiades; J P Harris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Effects of attention on localization of stimuli in the visual field.

Authors:  Y Tsal; T Bareket
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

3.  Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model.

Authors:  K R Cave; N P Bichot
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

4.  Dynamic interaction of object- and space-based attention in retinotopic visual areas.

Authors:  Notger G Müller; Andreas Kleinschmidt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation.

Authors:  M Kathryn Bleckley; Francis T Durso; Jerry M Crutchfield; Randall W Engle; Maya M Khanna
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

6.  Allocation of visual attention in younger and older adults.

Authors:  A A Hartley; J Kieley; C R McKenzie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

7.  Object-based selection operating on a spatial representation made salient by dimensional segmentation mechanisms: a re-investigation of Egly and Homa (1984).

Authors:  Hermann J Müller; Rebecca B O'Grady
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-24

8.  Attention is biased to near surfaces.

Authors:  Greg L West; Jay Pratt; Mary A Peterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

9.  Where does attention go when it moves? Spatial properties and locus of the attentional repulsion effect.

Authors:  Anna A Kosovicheva; Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Rapid feature-driven changes in the attentional window.

Authors:  Carly J Leonard; Javier Lopez-Calderon; Johanna Kreither; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.