Literature DB >> 8074391

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England and Wales: results of an audit by the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

D Dunn1, R Nair, S Fowler, R McCloy.   

Abstract

The results of an audit of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy conducted by the Comparative Audit Service of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are presented. Data were submitted by 124 consultant surgeons on 3319 attempted laparoscopic and by 227 consultant surgeons on 8035 open cholecystectomies performed in England and Wales during the 2 years 1990 and 1991. These were contrasted with 9322 attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomies reported in 21 series reported in the world literature between 1991 and 1992, and with five other nations' audit studies. Among attempted laparoscopic cases, conversion to an open procedure was necessary in 175/3319 (5.2%) of cases and overall mortality was 0.15% (5/3319). Major complications were reported in 2.1% and minor complications in 5.9% of cases. Bile duct injury was reported to be significantly more common after attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (11/3319, 0.33%) than after open cholecystectomy (4/8035, 0.06%) (95% confidence intervals -0.48 to 0.08), but it was not significantly different from that reported for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the combined world literature (28/9322, 0.3%) (95% confidence intervals -0.19 to 0.25). Most systemic complications were significantly more common after open cholecystectomy. For open cholecystectomy, the mortality was 55/8035 (0.76%), with major complications reported in 3.2% and minor complications in 9.8% of patients. Adoption of the laparoscopic approach was associated with a four-fifths reduction in the mortality of cholecystectomy, and a 40% reduction in the overall complication rate when compared with the open operation. While laparoscopic cholecystectomy has an impressively low mortality and morbidity profile during the first 2 years of its introduction into the UK, prevention of bile duct injury is the most important issue to be addressed in all laparoscopic cholecystectomy training programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8074391      PMCID: PMC2502253     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  24 in total

1.  Through the keyhole.

Authors:  R McCloy
Journal:  Health Serv J       Date:  1992-11-12

2.  Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: analysis of 500 procedures.

Authors:  A T Spaw; E J Reddick; D O Olsen
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-03

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with operative cholangiogram.

Authors:  J D Corbitt; D V Cantwell
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-12

4.  The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; F Dubois; J Mouiel; P Mouret; H Becker; G Buess; M Trede; H Troidl
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Conventional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trial. Cholecystectomy Study Group.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; W Spangenberger; A Dietrich; R Lefering
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of 82 cases.

Authors:  J H Meador; Y Nowzaradan; W Matzelle
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  Open laparoscopy for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R J Fitzgibbons; S Schmid; R Santoscoy; S Tyndall; R Hinder; C J Filipi; J Jenkins; R J Fitzgibbons; G M Salerno
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-12

8.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases.

Authors:  D J Deziel; K W Millikan; S G Economou; A Doolas; S T Ko; M C Airan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  A prospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S E Attwood; A D Hill; K Mealy; R B Stephens
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C R Voyles; A B Petro; A L Meena; A J Haick; A M Koury
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  7 in total

1.  Medicolegal costs of bile duct injuries incurred during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Pankaj G Roy; Zahir F Soonawalla; Hugh W Grant
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Role of laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eimer O'Malley; Emily Boyle; Adrian O'Callaghan; J Calvin Coffey; Stewart R Walsh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  NATALI--a model for National Computer Databases in the investigation of new therapeutic techniques.

Authors:  B D Braithwaite; A W Ritchie; J J Earnshaw
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  A rare case of subcapsular liver haematoma following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Victoria Brown; Jennifer Martin; Damian Magee
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-06-25

5.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Shea; M J Healey; J A Berlin; J R Clarke; P F Malet; R N Staroscik; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Changing patterns of traumatic bile duct injuries: a review of forty years experience.

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Huang; Xiao-Qiang Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Safety and efficacy of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for abdominal wall hernias.

Authors:  Hanh Tran
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.