Literature DB >> 1669371

Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: analysis of 500 procedures.

A T Spaw1, E J Reddick, D O Olsen.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy (LLC) is a less morbid alternative to open cholecystectomy. The advantages of laparoscopic techniques associated with advances in laser technology have heralded a dramatic advancement in the surgical treatment of biliary disease. Earlier return to work, lower morbidity, and lower medical expense are known advantages of laparoscopic surgery. We present the findings of our initial 500 procedures. The outcome of the first 200 procedures is compared to the following 300 procedures. Operating time averaged 88 min, and cholangiograms were achieved in 79%. Thirty-two percent were performed as outpatients and average hospital stay was 0.98 days. Conversion to open cholecystectomy occurred in 1.8% of cases and there were 5 major complications related to the procedure. No wound infections and no respiratory complications were encountered. There were no mortalities. Management of common bile duct stones with combined surgical and endoscopic modalities are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1669371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc        ISSN: 1051-7200


  32 in total

1.  Laparoscopic management of CBD stones: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Jagdish Chander; Anubhav Vindal; Pawanindra Lal; Nikhil Gupta; Vinod Kumar Ramteke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Selective cholangiography. Current role in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo; M A Talamini; B H Wang; H A Pitt; T R Gadacz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis of 140 cases.

Authors:  S D Wexner; P Reissman; J Pfeifer; M Bernstein; N Geron
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The role of preoperative investigations in predicting difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Results in 200 consecutive cases.

Authors:  D Urbano; R Di Nardo; P De Simone; M Rossi; D Alfani; R Cortesini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  I G Martin; S P Dexter; J Marton; J Gibson; J Asker; A Firullo; M J McMahon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic choledochoscopy with a small-caliber endoscope. A safe and effective technique for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  W E Kelley; V C Sheridan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kalpesh Jani; P S Rajan; K Sendhilkumar; C Palanivelu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients who have had previous abdominal surgery.

Authors:  K Miller; N Hölbling; J Hutter; W Junger; E Moritz; T Speil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: mechanism of injury, prevention, and management.

Authors:  H J Asbun; R L Rossi; J A Lowell; J L Munson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Trends in bile duct injuries from laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R M Walsh; J M Henderson; D P Vogt; J T Mayes; S Grundfest-Broniatowski; M Gagner; J L Ponsky; R E Hermann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.