Literature DB >> 1825759

A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

C R Voyles1, A B Petro, A L Meena, A J Haick, A M Koury.   

Abstract

A prospective study of 500 consecutive cholecystectomies was initiated with the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in 96% of patients presenting with primary gallbladder disease and was completed in 95%. There were no deaths or bile duct injuries. Two patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were transfused for postoperative bleeding, and only one patient required reoperation for any reason. A prospective study showed reduced operating time (20 minutes) and patient charges ($546) using electrosurgical dissection compared with laser. Reusable trocars were used without any associated injury or morbidity. An effective strategy for selective cholangiography was developed based on patient history, liver enzymes, and common duct diameter. In conclusion, laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to be a safe operation. The cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be enhanced ($1,271) with no loss of patient benefit using the combination of electrosurgery, reusable trocars, and selective cholangiograms in low-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1825759     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90599-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  41 in total

Review 1.  Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  T Ralph-Edwards; H S Himal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Routine versus selective intra-operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N J Soper; D L Dunnegan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  I M Macintyre; R G Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-21

Review 4.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopy in General Surgery: The pros and cons of endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  P J O'Regan; D L Anderson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Bile leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy demonstrated with 99mTc-PMT hepatobiliary scintigraphy.

Authors:  M Oshima; H Yasukochi
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.668

7.  The cost of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in a community hospital.

Authors:  V W Vanek; C C Bourguet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D P McKellar; R M Johnson; J A Dutro; J Mellinger; W A Bernie; J B Peoples
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Pulmonary embolism following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of two cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  J Mayol; E Vincent-Hamelin; J M Sarmiento; E O Oshiro; J Diaz-Gonzalez; F J Tamayo; J A Fernándeź-Represa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kalpesh Jani; P S Rajan; K Sendhilkumar; C Palanivelu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.