Literature DB >> 1471836

A prospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy.

S E Attwood1, A D Hill, K Mealy, R B Stephens.   

Abstract

In one surgical unit, 115 patients undergoing cholecystectomy were studied to compare patient recovery, subjective and objective pain experienced and complications after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. The data were collected prospectively where allocation to open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy was by consecutive attendance. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was feasible in 90% of patients presenting with symptomatic gallstones. Compared with the open operation, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was safe with less peroperative and postoperative morbidity, was more cost-effective and was associated with faster patient recovery as documented by less postoperative pain, earlier return to diet, earlier full mobilisation and discharge home. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to open cholecystectomy and should be available to all patients requiring elective cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1471836      PMCID: PMC2497695     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  10 in total

1.  The comparative effects of muscle transection and median upper abdominal incisions on postoperative pulmonary function.

Authors:  J Ali; T A Khan
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1979-06

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Dundee technique.

Authors:  L K Nathanson; S Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Safe performance of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors:  E J Reddick; D Olsen; A Spaw; D Baird; H Asbun; M O'Reilly; K Fisher; W Saye
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Conventional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trial. Cholecystectomy Study Group.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; W Spangenberger; A Dietrich; R Lefering
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Reduced postoperative hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Grace; A Quereshi; J Coleman; R Keane; G McEntee; P Broe; H Osborne; D Bouchier-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Minimal access surgery: the birth of a new era.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1990-12

7.  The stabilized ring retractor: a technique for cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R C Russell; S Shankar
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  "Mini-cholecystectomy" and operative cholangiography. A means of cost containment.

Authors:  I R Goco; L G Chambers
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

Authors:  S E Attwood; A D Hill; P G Murphy; J Thornton; R B Stephens
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D O Olsen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

  10 in total
  15 in total

1.  Clinical validation of percutaneous cochlear implant surgery: initial report.

Authors:  Robert Frederick Labadie; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Ramya Balachandran; Omid Majdani; J Michael Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Minimally Invasive vs. Open Hepatectomy: a Comparative Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Authors:  Fabio Bagante; Gaya Spolverato; Steven M Strasberg; Faiz Gani; Vanessa Thompson; Bruce L Hall; David J Bentrem; Henry A Pitt; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy: A safe and effective alternative surgical technique in "difficult cholecystectomies".

Authors:  Fatih Kulen; Deniz Tihan; Uğur Duman; Emrah Bayam; Gökhan Zaim
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2016-04-06

4.  Multivariate comparison of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G R Jatzko; P H Lisborg; A M Pertl; H M Stettner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K E Hobbs
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  A new method of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  U Maestroni; D Sortini; C Devito; F Pour Morad Kohan Brunaldi; G Anania; L Pavanelli; A Pasqualucci; A Donini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Do patient or hospital demographics predict cholecystectomy outcomes? A nationwide study of 93,578 patients.

Authors:  A M Carbonell; A E Lincourt; K W Kercher; B D Matthews; W S Cobb; R F Sing; B T Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Laparoscopic repair reduces incidence of surgical site infections for all ventral hernias.

Authors:  Nestor A Arita; Mylan T Nguyen; Duyen H Nguyen; Rachel L Berger; Debbie F Lew; James T Suliburk; Erik P Askenasy; Lillian S Kao; Mike K Liang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  A multi-institutional analysis of open versus minimally-invasive surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma: results of the US gastric cancer collaborative.

Authors:  Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Aslam Ejaz; Vicente Valero; Malcolm H Squires; George Poultsides; Ryan C Fields; Mark Bloomston; Sharon M Weber; Alexandra W Acher; Konstantinos Votanopoulos; Carl Schmidt; Clifford S Cho; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.