Literature DB >> 8063230

Imaging of the common bile duct in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

P J Hainsworth1, M Rhodes, R H Gompertz, C P Armstrong, T W Lennard.   

Abstract

Options for managing the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy include routine peroperative cholangiography and selected preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The use of these methods was reviewed in 350 patients with symptomatic gall stones referred for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Unit A (n = 114) performed routine cystic duct cholangiography but undertook preoperative ERCP in patients at very high risk of duct stones only; unit B (n = 236) performed selected preoperative ERCP on the basis of known risk factors for duct stones. The detection rate for common bile duct stones was similar for units A and B (16% v 20%). In unit A, five of seven patients who had preoperative ERCP had duct stones. Operative cholangiography was technically successful in 90% of patients and duct stones were confidently identified in 13, one of whom went on to immediate open duct exploration. Postoperative ERCP identified duct stones in only four patients, indicating spontaneous passage in eight. In unit B, preoperative ERCP was undertaken in 76 of 236 (32%) patients and duct stones were identified in 47 (20%). Duct clearance was successful in 42 (18%) but failed in five (2%), necessitating elective open duct exploration. Both protocols for imaging the common bile duct worked well and yielded satisfactory short term results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8063230      PMCID: PMC1374850          DOI: 10.1136/gut.35.7.991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  34 in total

1.  Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct. A cause for concern.

Authors:  A R Moossa; D W Easter; E Van Sonnenberg; G Casola; H D'Agostino
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic cholangiography: an effective and inexpensive technique.

Authors:  R H Gompertz; M Rhodes; T W Lennard
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Plea for selective operative cholangiography.

Authors:  A W Yip; W S Ng; W C Chow; T K Choi; K H Lam
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1991-02

4.  Bile duct stones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D Scott-Coombes; J N Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-23

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Dundee technique.

Authors:  L K Nathanson; S Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J G Hunter
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A M Davidoff; T N Pappas; E A Murray; D J Hilleren; R D Johnson; M E Baker; G E Newman; P B Cotton; W C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications.

Authors:  J L Flowers; K A Zucker; S M Graham; W A Scovill; A L Imbembo; R W Bailey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C R Voyles; A B Petro; A L Meena; A J Haick; A M Koury
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Experience with 375 consecutive patients.

Authors:  R W Bailey; K A Zucker; J L Flowers; W A Scovill; S M Graham; A L Imbembo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  10 in total

1.  Common bile duct stone characteristics: correlation with treatment choice during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R A Duensing; R A Williams; J C Collins; S E Wilson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

Authors:  S Varadarajulu; M A Eloubeidi; C M Wilcox; R H Hawes; P B Cotton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Prediction of which patients with an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram will have a confirmed stone at ERCP.

Authors:  Matthew P Spinn; David S Wolf; Dharmendra Verma; Frank J Lukens
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Surgery for common bile duct stones--a lost surgical skill; still worthwhile in the minimally invasive century?

Authors:  Harald Puhalla; Nathan Flint; Nicholas O'Rourke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Factors predicting outcome after selective ERCP in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  G S Robertson; P R Johnson; B J Rathbone; A C Wicks; D M Lloyd; P S Veitch
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without routine operative cholangiography does not result in significant problems related to retained stones.

Authors:  D J A Thornton; A Robertson; D J Alexander
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  For patients with predicted low risk for choledocholithiasis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, selective intraoperative cholangiography and postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is an effective strategy to limit unnecessary procedures.

Authors:  Michael F Byrne; Mark T McLoughlin; Robert M Mitchell; Henning Gerke; K Kim; Theodore N Pappas; M S Branch; Paul S Jowell; John Baillie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Identifying patients most likely to have a common bile duct stone after a positive intraoperative cholangiogram.

Authors:  Raja Vadlamudi; Jason Conway; Girish Mishra; John Baillie; John Gilliam; Adolfo Fernandez; John Evans
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2014-04

9.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Stephen Morris; Kurinchi S Gurusamy; Jessica Sheringham; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  ASGE guidelines result in cost-saving in the management of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Gaurav Singhvi; Rajiv Ampara; Joel Baum; Vivek Gumaste
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.