Literature DB >> 11972195

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without routine operative cholangiography does not result in significant problems related to retained stones.

D J A Thornton1, A Robertson, D J Alexander.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether failure to identify common bile duct stones at laparoscopic cholecystectomy results in significant postoperative complications related to retained stones.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the case notes of 377 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy without routine operative cholangiography under a single surgeon in a district general hospital between 1995 and 1999. Highly selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was employed to identify and manage suspected bile duct stones in pancreatitis, jaundice, persistently elevated liver function tests, or a dilated common bile duct.
RESULTS: Eighteen (4.8%) of 377 patients presented postoperatively with symptoms/signs suggesting biliary pathology. Two (0.5%) were confirmed to have retained duct stones/debris (ultrasound/ERCP); both recovered with conservative treatment. Only 1 patient of 274 (0.4%) without preoperative ERCP subsequently presented with a symptomatic retained stone, the other having been stented preoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Highly selective preoperative ERCP without routine operative cholangiography is not associated with a significant increase in morbidity/mortality related to retained stones following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11972195     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9158-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is not necessary in mild gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  H S Himal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Place of routine operative cholangiography at cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A P Corder; S D Scott; C D Johnson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without operative cholangiogram: 2038 cases over a 5-year period in two district general hospitals.

Authors:  O M Taylor; P C Sedman; B M Jones; C M Royston; T Arulampalam; J Wellwood
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M Rhodes; L Sussman; L Cohen; M P Lewis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct: lessons learned from 129 consecutive cases.

Authors:  M Rhodes; L Nathanson; N O'Rourke; G Fielding
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment of gallstones and bile duct stones: a prospective study.

Authors:  A L Widdison; A J Longstaff; C P Armstrong
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Implications for common bile duct injury and retained common bile duct stones.

Authors:  J S Barkun; G M Fried; A N Barkun; H H Sigman; E J Hinchey; J Garzon; M J Wexler; J L Meakins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Imaging of the common bile duct in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P J Hainsworth; M Rhodes; R H Gompertz; C P Armstrong; T W Lennard
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Management of bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J Perissat; K Huibregtse; F B Keane; R C Russell; J P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in laparoscopic biliary surgery.

Authors:  H Rijna; P J Borgstein; S G Meuwissen; L M de Brauw; N P Wildenborg; M A Cuesta
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.939

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Routine laparoscopic ultrasound can significantly reduce the need for selective intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J Machi; A J Oishi; T Tajiri; K M Murayama; N L Furumoto; R H Oishi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Mild acute biliary pancreatitis vs cholelithiasis: are there differences in the rate of choledocholithiasis?

Authors:  Rosa Bertolín-Bernades; Luis Sabater-Ortí; Julio Calvete-Chornet; Bruno Camps-Vilata; Norberto Cassinello-Fernández; Miguel Oviedo-Bravo; Purificación Ivorra-García Monco; Raúl Cánovas-de Lucas; Salvador Lledó-Matoses
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  [Gallbladder calculi--always an indication for surgery?].

Authors:  R Bittner; M Ulrich
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Laparoscopic ultrasound as the primary method for bile duct imaging during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K A Perry; J A Myers; D J Deziel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Incidence of residual choledocholithiasis detected by intraoperative cholangiography at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients having undergone preoperative ERCP.

Authors:  Richard A Pierce; Sreenivasa Jonnalagadda; Jennifer A Spitler; Deron J Tessier; Jane M Liaw; Shelly C Lall; Lora M Melman; Margaret M Frisella; Laura M Todt; L Michael Brunt; Valerie J Halpin; J Christopher Eagon; Steven A Edmundowicz; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.